What's new

Conor Gallagher

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,320
83,585
i reckon this is Journo 'Bingo' now....
Yep, very hard to tell how genuine the interest is.

My reading is he's a player we're interested in but don't see him as such a vital signing that we'll break the bank for him. We'll monitor his availability and if we buy him, it'll be with the element of opportunism.

If we buy him then we have 4 good options in Bentancur, Sarr, Bissouma and Gallagher with Skipp and Bergvall still developing.

Happy if we get him for a reasonable fee, won't be bothered if he doesn't become available.
 

McFlash

In the corner, eating crayons.
Oct 19, 2005
12,902
46,132
To put it in perspective, Ndombele, Richarlison, Johnson, Romero, Maddison, Sanchez, Porro, van de Ven and Sissoko all cost somewhere between £60m and £50m each
Not sure they did, to be honest.
My memory is shocking but I thought Mads was 40m (but with a sale of Winks for 10m, so really only 30), Porro was about 30 odd, Sanchez was 42m including add-ons and Sissoko was 30m.
I also though VdV was about mid thirties?
Johnson was 48m, so the only ones between 50 and 60m would be Richy and Cuti?
Oh, and Tanguy...how could I forget him?!

As I say though, my memory is terrible and I can't be arsed to look it all up. 😁
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,320
83,585
I think if we go for Gallagher, part of the point would be it’s not a splurge. We’d be looking to take advantage of Gallagher’s contract situation and Chelsea’s financial problems. I think we would be looking to do the deal at the £30ish mill mark, which in today’s market isn’t that much.

To put it in perspective, Ndombele, Richarlison, Johnson, Romero, Maddison, Sanchez, Porro, van de Ven and Sissoko all cost somewhere between £60m and £50m each and Lo Celso was also close to £30m I think. If we do buy Gallagher he would be towards the lower end of that price range and some of those players were bought four or five years ago or more.

More like £30m-60m.
 

Styopa

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2014
5,349
14,808
Not sure they did, to be honest.
My memory is shocking but I thought Mads was 40m (but with a sale of Winks for 10m, so really only 30), Porro was about 30 odd, Sanchez was 42m including add-ons and Sissoko was 30m.
I also though VdV was about mid thirties?
Johnson was 48m, so the only ones between 50 and 60m would be Richy and Cuti?
Oh, and Tanguy...how could I forget him?!

As I say though, my memory is terrible and I can't be arsed to look it all up. 😁

You’re right, I meant between sixty and thirty mill, with Gallagher being at the lower range of that spectrum at £30m if we do buy him. Assuming of course thirty mill would be his price, but I don’t think we would be interested in him at much higher than that.
 

SpursSince1980

Well-Known Member
Jan 23, 2011
4,754
14,485
Not really sure why he'd want to even leave Chelsea. Seems more like him trying to get the best deal possible.

Then again, I can only begin to imagine what their wage / turnover must be at with the trillion new players they brought in. And I'd imagine he'd be looking for 80 to 100k per week... at least.

For better or worse, I'm a fan. Think he'd be a great fit in our system. Ange loves flexibility, and this guy can play the "8" and "10" position well.
 

onthetwo

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2006
4,583
3,407
Not really sure why he'd want to even leave Chelsea. Seems more like him trying to get the best deal possible.

Then again, I can only begin to imagine what their wage / turnover must be at with the trillion new players they brought in. And I'd imagine he'd be looking for 80 to 100k per week... at least.

For better or worse, I'm a fan. Think he'd be a great fit in our system. Ange loves flexibility, and this guy can play the "8" and "10" position well.
i know its slightly different to an Ar***al player signing for us....but not that much.
Anyway...
 

Hazelton

Unknown Member
Jul 11, 2011
5,620
19,606
I doubt many will agree with me but if we're looking for an all action midfielder who won't be first choice and is ideally home grown, for my money Ross Barkley is every bit as good as Gallagher and wouldn't cost anywhere near the silly money Chelsea would demand.
 

Snarfalicious

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2012
15,721
72,073
I doubt many will agree with me but if we're looking for an all action midfielder who won't be first choice and is ideally home grown, for my money Ross Barkley is every bit as good as Gallagher and wouldn't cost anywhere near the silly money Chelsea would demand.

His redemption arc has been so awesome.
 

lincspurs

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2011
691
1,330
I doubt many will agree with me but if we're looking for an all action midfielder who won't be first choice and is ideally home grown, for my money Ross Barkley is every bit as good as Gallagher and wouldn't cost anywhere near the silly money Chelsea would demand.
Having watched him recently, & especially after 2day I have to agree. Mind you Lokonga looked really impressive 2day too.
 

Ruffinthepuffin

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2011
1,323
3,831
I doubt many will agree with me but if we're looking for an all action midfielder who won't be first choice and is ideally home grown, for my money Ross Barkley is every bit as good as Gallagher and wouldn't cost anywhere near the silly money Chelsea would demand.
Always liked him and really wanted him before he went to Chelsea but he’s 31 this year so it’s a very hard no from me.
 

mill

Well-Known Member
May 21, 2007
10,407
37,141
We’re linked to Everton’s James garner as an alternative to Gallagher
 

Styopa

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2014
5,349
14,808
Always liked him and really wanted him before he went to Chelsea but he’s 31 this year so it’s a very hard no from me.

Looking back, him choosing Chelsea may have been a bit of a turning point for us. If he had lived up to his potential, we would have been a much stronger midfield with him than with the Winks and Sissoko combo. But yeah, I think that ship has passed now.
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,320
83,585
Barkley is an interesting option. He's done well for Luton this season. I believe he is out of contract this summer. If I'm wrong, he'd still be available for cheap should they get relegated.

Maybe his good form is connected to playing regularly or being the main man, he could struggle as a squad player. But for a 1-2 year he could be a good option.
 
Top