Player Watch Player Watch: Guglielmo Vicario
- Thread starter THFCSPURS19
- Start date
luRRka
Well-Known Member
- Jul 27, 2008
- 3,665
- 15,535
Because in the 2nd half they had 3 corners and didn't put a man fouling Vic. They left him to it. That's why he caught the ball
Ribble
Well-Known Member
- Apr 13, 2011
- 3,515
- 4,795
DogsOfWar
Well-Known Member
- Jan 12, 2005
- 2,303
- 3,644
The player on Vic is not trying to win the ball, he's just pushing into him to try to obstruct him so it is basically a foul.
These have always been given so I'm a bit baffled as to why refs have stopped giving them against us.
However, it is also worth pointing out that Everton still managed two headers in the six yard to score so the defence is also culpable.
These have always been given so I'm a bit baffled as to why refs have stopped giving them against us.
However, it is also worth pointing out that Everton still managed two headers in the six yard to score so the defence is also culpable.
Yantino
Well-Known Member
- Apr 28, 2012
- 666
- 3,058
It seems common place nowadays that it is going to be totally dependent on who the ref is each week and what mood they are in.
One week they are fouls, the next week they aren't. So who knows. No blame or concern with Vicario IMO, player of the season so far.
One week they are fouls, the next week they aren't. So who knows. No blame or concern with Vicario IMO, player of the season so far.
Create spqce for himself, to be fsir though, this one is more about being blocked off his movement, i cant post videos from my phome because id show you exactly how to deal with it to create space
mil1lion
This is the place to be
- May 7, 2004
- 42,493
- 78,074
The ones he caught 2nd half were all far post and he was able to travel back to catch. After the goal the ref strangely started to give fouls so I think it may be why Everton stopped impeding him 2nd half.
ernie78
Well-Known Member
- Jun 13, 2012
- 7,306
- 15,350
I did t understand why we didn’t do it on our very next corner. Highlight the hypocrisy and inconsistency
Sp3akerboxxx
Adoption: Nabil Bentaleb
- Apr 4, 2006
- 5,356
- 8,025
IfiHadTheWings
Well-Known Member
- Aug 5, 2013
- 3,667
- 11,630
How would you shield the ball without using your body or arms?
seems a bit redundant
rossdapep
Well-Known Member
- Aug 25, 2011
- 22,155
- 79,696
I am sure refs would change their opinion on that had they been GKs
I do agree with this, but also can see why it wasnt given as well.
Still maintain the keeper has to do more and i bet you thst without a doubt he'll be working on exactly that in training this week
I still feel like this is something that we are more inclined to see as a foul because it has affected us negatively in a couple of matches and could do so again going forward.
I wonder if it was a one off incident that had gone in our favour (as in this issue had never arisen with Vicario but instead Richy had done something similar at the other end leading to a goal for us) whether we would so convinced it was a foul?
I have to admit when I watched it in real time I didn’t think it was a foul. I’m willing to admit I’m wrong about that though and a lot of knowledgeable people on here do believe it is a foul - people that seem to be more knowledgeable about the current rules than I am. But by the same token you have some ex-refs saying it’s not.
I wonder if it was a one off incident that had gone in our favour (as in this issue had never arisen with Vicario but instead Richy had done something similar at the other end leading to a goal for us) whether we would so convinced it was a foul?
I have to admit when I watched it in real time I didn’t think it was a foul. I’m willing to admit I’m wrong about that though and a lot of knowledgeable people on here do believe it is a foul - people that seem to be more knowledgeable about the current rules than I am. But by the same token you have some ex-refs saying it’s not.
Sp3akerboxxx
Adoption: Nabil Bentaleb
- Apr 4, 2006
- 5,356
- 8,025
Wait, what? He doesn't think it was a foul because they did it more than once? That makes sense. Especially since it was called as a foul on one of those corners.
Also, watching it again to take a look at the potential offside, there's a very clear foul on Richy as well. He just gets shoved into the goal.
JoaoPereira
Well-Known Member
- Sep 5, 2020
- 649
- 936
there still is but certainly not to the same degree. the other day Onana nearly decapitated a Wolves player and got away with it.
easley91
Well-Known Member
- Jan 27, 2011
- 19,059
- 54,730
I'm talking strictly fouls on the keepers, not fouls by keepers. Last season slightly backing into a keeper for a goal would be deemed a foul. I don't remember anyone coming out saying they would be more lenient about it, they just started doing it randomly one day.
Kirito
Well-Known Member
- May 22, 2013
- 4,833
- 9,439
I took that as he is now agreeing with everything you say and have ever said.A great and well reasoned response.
Similar threads
