What's new

Harry Kane

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,690
78,576
There were a few times today when I thought Kane was getting into bad habits of dropping deep to get the ball, or trying to play out side the box - but look at the results of Kane playing the way Ange wants - up top:












Buckets of goals available to him when he trusts the players to get him the ball in front of the goal.

Funny because it's how Conte spoke in the past about where Kane should play but never played him that way
Although he only started dropping deep after Eriksen left
 

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,542
48,826
Possibly, they are probably in Top 5 clubs globally but Madrid, Barca, City they are not, no way would they be top of his list. He also knows the German League is not the Premiership or La Liga and without him they will almost certainly win trophies. Even the so called pundits agree its a bit of a strange choice. The Guaranteed trophies at Bayern will give him the Silverware but probably not be quite what he wanted and not enough to shut up any critics, hence it's more complicated than the City episode we had.
Think you’re forgetting a very key point which is Kane absolutely loves the champions league and whilst Bayern aren’t quite man.city at the moment, at that level with a manager like Tuchel and with the addition of Kane to an already pretty strong squad that could help them to really challenge for the CL the next few seasons.

Madrid aren’t the Madrid they were of the last 5+ years, Barca certainly aren’t anywhere near there usual strength, PSG are a bit of a mess and so without the choice of Man.City I think Bayern are right up there in terms of CL pedigree and outside chance with Kane of winning it.

That will be a huge factor in Kane’s decision.

In fact Bayern are 2nd favourites this season for the CL even without Kane as it stands!

If argue right now aside from Man.City there aren’t many better clubs Kane could go to than Bayern.

1691362690469.jpeg
 

robotsonic

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
2,458
11,396
Think you’re forgetting a very key point which is Kane absolutely loves the champions league and whilst Bayern aren’t quite man.city at the moment, at that level with a manager like Tuchel and with the addition of Kane to an already pretty strong squad that could help them to really challenge for the CL the next few seasons.

Madrid aren’t the Madrid they were of the last 5+ years, Barca certainly aren’t anywhere near there usual strength, PSG are a bit of a mess and so without the choice of Man.City I think Bayern are right up there in terms of CL pedigree and outside chance with Kane of winning it.

That will be a huge factor in Kane’s decision.

In fact Bayern are 2nd favourites this season for the CL even without Kane as it stands!

If argue right now aside from Man.City there aren’t many better clubs Kane could go to than Bayern.

View attachment 130093
Can't help but feel that trying to pick a team that have a chance at actually winning the CL is a bit of a crapshoot. We got to the final ffs. Inter were in the final last season. City took 15 years to win it, and PSG never have. Not sure you can make your career decisions on such things unless you're going to go to Madrid, which I think is a much better bet for him if he's wanting to see out his deal, than Bayern. They could sign Mbappe and Kane on a free next year if they want to, to add to their front 3, such is the pull of that club over Bayern.
 

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,542
48,826
Can't help but feel that trying to pick a team that have a chance at actually winning the CL is a bit of a crapshoot. We got to the final ffs. Inter were in the final last season. City took 15 years to win it, and PSG never have. Not sure you can make your career decisions on such things unless you're going to go to Madrid, which I think is a much better bet for him if he's wanting to see out his deal, than Bayern. They could sign Mbappe and Kane on a free next year if they want to, to add to their front 3, such is the pull of that club over Bayern.
I get what you mean but at Bayern he has as good a chance of winning the CL as any other team bar City.

Bookies have them as 2nd favourites without Kane, their record the last 20 years is incredibly consistent.

Madrid aren’t in for Kane and are a bit of an aging side, I think their CL stardust is fading.

Either way he has a far better chance at trophies and possibly a CL trophy at Bayern than he does staying with us and so the Q is does he want to do that or stay at Spurs for one more season and see how things go, I think given he’s just turned 30 and football is an unpredictable beast he won’t kick a gift horse in the mouth if Levy says ok we will accept Bayerns offer if you want to go.
 

KingNick

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2008
2,179
3,718
Only way Kane would sign a new deal imo is if it contained a sensible release clause.
Which, assuming we are talking something more like 50m, would seem to be something DL could agree to.

it does seem to always come down to how much HK values a move (and CL football) right now.
 

robotsonic

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
2,458
11,396
I get what you mean but at Bayern he has as good a chance of winning the CL as any other team bar City.

Bookies have them as 2nd favourites without Kane, their record the last 20 years is incredibly consistent.

Madrid aren’t in for Kane and are a bit of an aging side, I think their CL stardust is fading.

Either way he has a far better chance at trophies and possibly a CL trophy at Bayern than he does staying with us and so the Q is does he want to do that or stay at Spurs for one more season and see how things go, I think given he’s just turned 30 and football is an unpredictable beast he won’t kick a gift horse in the mouth if Levy says ok we will accept Bayerns offer if you want to go.
I suppose I agree in that City and Bayern both have as much chance as any of 10 teams based on the way it pans out over a season!

I still think, as I have all along, that this won't happen, as long as there is a chance for it to not. Thought it was done due to ITK, but until it is, I still just won't see it. Not enough upside for me for a year's wait to have his pick of future 4-5 years opportunities from HK's position,
 

robertgoulet

SC Resident Crooner Extraordinaire
Jul 23, 2013
3,611
12,552
Never understood the idea that the fact that he doesn't quite have the legs that he used to is enough reason to consider for a second shipping out the best finisher in world football because he isn't the best at something off of the ball. He's never once been a player that was a monster at pressing.

If we kept Kane and Ange can't find a way to make his way of football work with Harry Kane, then we never should have hired him. But that's not the case, because he can and would. Ange is about maintaining 65-70% possession, suffocating teams, playing exciting football and scoring goals. If Harry Kane can't press at 100% at 30+, then someone else (Maddison) can do that for him while he bags another 30 goals.
I’d argue if I’m Ange I want a team working together at 100% not people carrying the load for others who can’t and telling the squad “pick it up for Harry so he can get his 30” sets a bad example. “Everyone work hard and everyone benefits. James you’ll get 10-15, Sonny you’ll get 10-15, Deki you’ll get 10-15, Richy you’ll get 10-15” etc is a better motivation.
 

jolsnogross

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2005
3,817
5,638
Funny how this story bounces around and many were happy or coming to terms with a departure on Friday but the vibe is different now that he's shown, yet again, what he's about.

I would say the prospects for Spurs levels of achievement this season can be revised upwards if he stays. There's nobody else in the squad that would affect those prospects as much.
 

soflapaul

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
9,123
15,251
This is not a keep him/sell him point, as I don’t hold a particularly strong opinion on that, but I do think your argument is reaching a bit. To get the kind of money you’re mentioning we’d have to go quite far in the competition. I don’t think the exact figures for next season are available yet, but historically you’d have to reach the final for prize money of 95m.

So yes, qualification is lucrative, but even with that the odds are that we’d likely still fall short of the reported 100m fee by a good 40m - which is no small amount.
It isn't a small amount but here's the two things. First, decisions have to be made in real time where will we be with and without him. Second, you aren't accounting for all the money that's at stake - the commercial value of having HK's face splashed over the newspapers and our sponsors being happy as hell. the ability to attract additoinal talen, naming rights. And really there's a third. If Danny sells him after today's performance, what will the atmosphere of the stadium be like. What's the impact on the brand. DOn't forget that the acoustics of the stadium can work for or against us..

It's a huge gamble for sure, but when you look at all the money that we stand to lose without him, the risk is less than 40M. But, it does require further investment which would have a ROI for years to come if you pick up the right players. Bring in two CBs that can play a high line effectivley and learn it quick and i'm willing to wager on our final position. People have us pencilled in for somewhere between 6-8. Keep Harry and get two smart CBs and we are in the hunt for 4th. If 5 spots open up for EPL, then this is the year you need to go big to return. We may have been granted a stay of execution (of the trade). If so, we need to dare. Cheers
 

Shanks

Kinda not anymore....
May 11, 2005
31,232
19,263
Imagine being ange, if Kane stays.

every single press conference will be questions about Kane for the whole season, everything we do will all be about him - honestly whole situation is a nightmare for a manager who is trying to establish a team, rather than set up a team for one player.

which is why if he stays a new deal has to be signed as a minimum - that’s respecting the badge etc
 

C1w8

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2011
594
1,116
Think you’re forgetting a very key point which is Kane absolutely loves the champions league and whilst Bayern aren’t quite man.city at the moment, at that level with a manager like Tuchel and with the addition of Kane to an already pretty strong squad that could help them to really challenge for the CL the next few seasons.

Madrid aren’t the Madrid they were of the last 5+ years, Barca certainly aren’t anywhere near there usual strength, PSG are a bit of a mess and so without the choice of Man.City I think Bayern are right up there in terms of CL pedigree and outside chance with Kane of winning it.

That will be a huge factor in Kane’s decision.

In fact Bayern are 2nd favourites this season for the CL even without Kane as it stands!

If argue right now aside from Man.City there aren’t many better clubs Kane could go to than Bayern.

View attachment 130093

I would suspect the kane transfer has been partly factored into this already, but agreed i do think bayern is a lot more attractive an option than many are making out.
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,701
104,999
There were a few times today when I thought Kane was getting into bad habits of dropping deep to get the ball, or trying to play out side the box - but look at the results of Kane playing the way Ange wants - up top:












Buckets of goals available to him when he trusts the players to get him the ball in front of the goal.


I thought that too first half but second half he was much better at staying in the box. Ange said there’s still lots of work to do to get them playing how he wants and I suspect the centre forward’s role being played properly is integral to that. He’s had the freedom of the pitch to do a lot of what he wants under the last two managers. Whilst I suspect he will get some freedom, he needs to stay in the right area.
 

jazz15c

SC Supporter
Jul 29, 2010
1,422
2,232
Them lot down the road have spunked £100 million on England's starting DM, and have spent £300 million, making them the highest spending club in Europe in this window.

We're flogging one of our greatest ever player to buy a couple CB's.

As the kids say; levels. :(
 

For the love of Spurs

Well-Known Member
Mar 28, 2015
3,454
11,292
Them lot down the road have spunked £100 million on England's starting DM, and have spent £300 million, making them the highest spending club in Europe in this window.

We're flogging one of our greatest ever player to buy a couple CB's.

As the kids say; levels. :(

if we where Arsenal we would throw £70m at Silva from Benfica or at least get Tapsoba to help fix our backline and then offer Kane whatever he wanted to try and get him to stay.

The sad thing is with this manager, this system and Kane we are only a defence away from a great team. Surely the club can see that, we aren’t far off if we just do a bit more. Keeping Kane and a fixed defence and we are in business.
 
Last edited:

Styopa

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2014
5,400
15,026
The real elephant in the room is not whether he stays this season but where he plays next season.

I can easily see us having a decent first season under Ange with Kane central to everything followed by an almighty fall next season as the club tries to adjust to life without him. Ange could easily end up being the fall guy like Ramos and AVB were when they lost their key players after decent first seasons.

Hopefully, I am being overly pessimistic but we have witnessed our fair share of false dawns at Spurs. It would be hugely disappointing to be starting over again in eighteen months' time.
 
Top