- Aug 31, 2012
- 4,015
- 10,537
We should do these deals regardless of Kane leaving or not
I think we have been as well though. Gil, Sarr, Udogie and now it seems Phillips and Veliz. We got Lankshear for the academy too. We've picked this end up the last few years. The more we sign the more will make it as you know a percentage won't turn out good. Getting back to signing young talent and a manager who will coach and give them a chance too. This is the way.We should do these deals regardless of Kane leaving or not
Soonsup-Bell tooI think we have been as well though. Gil, Sarr, Udogie and now it seems Phillips and Veliz. We got Lankshear for the academy too. We've picked this end up the last few years. The more we sign the more will make it as you know a percentage won't turn out good. Getting back to signing young talent and a manager who will coach and give them a chance too. This is the way.
Dane 20th on CF list too.Think it was already shared but there's a running list of the top 200 young players, found here.
Veliz ranks 10th overall, and 5th on the list for CFs. What's more interesting than me just resharing a link is that if you look at the list of CFs we have been pretty involved.
1. Marcos Leonardo - not much info on him from my PoV
2. Vitor Roque - Journos and his agent said we were trying for him before he agreed with Barca
3. Endrick Felipe - Agreed with Real Madrid
4. Youssoufa Moukoko - We were linked by journos like Jacobs and others that we were going to swoop if he didn't renew with BVB
5. Alejo Veliz
6. Benjamin Sesko - Just moved from RB Salzburg to Leipzig. Articles in the past saying we're scouting him.
7. Mathys Tel - Obviously strong links with a swap deal of sorts with Kane
8. Evan Ferguson - Many on here think he's the ideal Kane replacement. Some links that we're interested.
So as you can see, we were (obviously) looking for a young CF and the Veliz deal seems to be the perfect blend of hype and value.
ain’t he like 26 nowI think we have been as well though. Gil, Sarr, Udogie and now it seems Phillips and Veliz. We got Lankshear for the academy too. We've picked this end up the last few years. The more we sign the more will make it as you know a percentage won't turn out good. Getting back to signing young talent and a manager who will coach and give them a chance too. This is the way.
I still have high hopes for Josh Onomah too
Just caught Tim Vickery on SSN, he's their South American expert (and a Spurs fan).
He started by offering a word of caution; he's seen a number of strikers thrive in Argentina but struggle in the Premier League so he has concerns when comparing Veliz to those named (about half a dozen).
He also says Veliz is physically strong for his age and his main strength is aerial ability and has scored a number of headed goals. Given quite a few have observed how low our crossing has been in pre-season, this seems odd.
The point he made (which has been touched on above) is how cheap players are when bought directly. Were he to move to, say, Portugal and succeed, his value will probably treble within months.
I saw that, bloke gets as much wrong as he does right tho.Just caught Tim Vickery on SSN, he's their South American expert (and a Spurs fan).
He started by offering a word of caution; he's seen a number of strikers thrive in Argentina but struggle in the Premier League so he has concerns when comparing Veliz to those named (about half a dozen).
He also says Veliz is physically strong for his age and his main strength is aerial ability and has scored a number of headed goals. Given quite a few have observed how low our crossing has been in pre-season, this seems odd.
The point he made (which has been touched on above) is how cheap players are when bought directly. Were he to move to, say, Portugal and succeed, his value will probably treble within months.
I must say I can completely understand why we would go for someone like Véliz over Beltrán as he is 3 years younger but I’m a little surprised we aren’t going for Leonardo. Whilst I like the look of Véliz and I think he has a lot of potential Marcos seems more well rounded and maybe better suited to the league. Don’t get me wrong, I’d be very happy with Véliz but at one year older and after clearly wanting Roque I’m a little surprised. Maybe Leonardo was significantly more price wise, if Véliz is only £11 mil one can understand why we are jumping on it.Think it was already shared but there's a running list of the top 200 young players, found here.
Veliz ranks 10th overall, and 5th on the list for CFs. What's more interesting than me just resharing a link is that if you look at the list of CFs we have been pretty involved.
1. Marcos Leonardo - not much info on him from my PoV
2. Vitor Roque - Journos and his agent said we were trying for him before he agreed with Barca
3. Endrick Felipe - Agreed with Real Madrid
4. Youssoufa Moukoko - We were linked by journos like Jacobs and others that we were going to swoop if he didn't renew with BVB
5. Alejo Veliz
6. Benjamin Sesko - Just moved from RB Salzburg to Leipzig. Articles in the past saying we're scouting him.
7. Mathys Tel - Obviously strong links with a swap deal of sorts with Kane
8. Evan Ferguson - Many on here think he's the ideal Kane replacement. Some links that we're interested.
So as you can see, we were (obviously) looking for a young CF and the Veliz deal seems to be the perfect blend of hype and value.
I wouldn’t listen to him too much tbh, his assessments are often wildly inaccurate. Furthermore this particular opinion of him seems to be entirely based on his performances for the U20’s and he doesn’t give any real mention of his ability and performances at club level aside from criticising the league as whole.Just caught Tim Vickery on SSN, he's their South American expert (and a Spurs fan).
He started by offering a word of caution; he's seen a number of strikers thrive in Argentina but struggle in the Premier League so he has concerns when comparing Veliz to those named (about half a dozen).
He also says Veliz is physically strong for his age and his main strength is aerial ability and has scored a number of headed goals. Given quite a few have observed how low our crossing has been in pre-season, this seems odd.
The point he made (which has been touched on above) is how cheap players are when bought directly. Were he to move to, say, Portugal and succeed, his value will probably treble within months.
The deal is that we loan him back to Rosario until the end of the Argentinean season (November, I believe). After that who knowsIf we are buying & loaning, we better loan him to a club in Europe or UK. No point loaning him back to Roasario.
And released by both Fulham then Preston…ain’t he like 26 now
only until he's 27ain’t he like 26 now
I've seen a few accounts who are followers of South American football who think those quotes are totally made up. Messi bigging up a Rosario Central player wouldn't go down too well the other side of the city with the Newells fans.If Messi says he plays like Suarez used to, that means more to me than some pundit's opinion.