- Dec 6, 2006
- 3,980
- 13,614
Did you really just say Arsenal are a much bigger club than us? Brave manMan Utd had to sell Ronaldo
Liverpool had to sell Suarez
Arsenal had to sell Henry
All much bigger clubs than us too.
We'll be ok
Did you really just say Arsenal are a much bigger club than us? Brave manMan Utd had to sell Ronaldo
Liverpool had to sell Suarez
Arsenal had to sell Henry
All much bigger clubs than us too.
We'll be ok
We can't be, that's why I said "in an attempt to appease". The only way fans will accept it, is if we sign a couple of top CBs and a new striker and come the end of the season we are in the top 4.I don't see how fans could be appeased to be honest. Selling possibly our best ever player due to incompetence over 6 years is unforgivable. We should never be in this position but here we are.
There is no silver lining here unfortunately
But 100m if it sorts our defence out…. Plus we reinvest on Muani and have a fast front 3 of son Muani Solomon and we press high and fast and pin teams back we can spread the goals out.I disagree. 100 mill can't buy that many goals. Ange has enough problems to deal with to get this squad firing, better to push the striker problem to next summer. Even if we don't get a fee.
And as a bonus: I think Kane wants to sign a new deal, we just need to give him a good excuse to do it. Play good football and get good results this season, and he'll sign, I'm sure of it.
If we sell him, he's gone for good.
Exactly this. Tapsoba, VDV, Muani and I’m happy it’s as good as we can get.We can't be, that's why I said "in an attempt to appease". The only way fans will accept it, is if we sign a couple of top CBs and a new striker and come the end of the season we are in the top 4.
We can't be, that's why I said "in an attempt to appease". The only way fans will accept it, is if we sign a couple of top CBs and a new striker and come the end of the season we are in the top 4.
Man Utd had to sell Ronaldo
Liverpool had to sell Suarez
Arsenal had to sell Henry
All much bigger clubs than us too.
We'll be ok
I just don’t see why we need to sell Kane to push through the centre backs we need. They should be coming in no matter what happens with Kane.
Why do we act like we have no money when we are loaded?
We’ll probably replace Kane with a £40m centre back and a £50m striker and many fans will be duped into thinking we’ve done well, when the reality is we should have already bought spent £40m on the first centre back and £20-30m on a second centre back and then spent the full £100m from the Kane sale on Kane’s replacement.
The only positive for me when Kane’s sale was first made clear was the thought that we could reinvest the money in the squad. But that should have been on top of our existing business, we shouldn’t have been relying on the Kane sale to do the bare minimum we needed to do.
We really need another English player to break through. Hopefully Devine o someone. Our English contingent is poor and one of the reason I don’t want Kane to go.
Only if the striker we bring in is the same value as what we sold Kane for. The 2x centre backs should have been brought in regardless of what happens with Kane.We can't be, that's why I said "in an attempt to appease". The only way fans will accept it, is if we sign a couple of top CBs and a new striker and come the end of the season we are in the top 4.
Audi and Tiger Cup say hiAnyone interested in a coping mechanism to try and feel better……..
Every single trophy in the entire global history of Football has been won without Harry Kane
You're going to be disappointed.It’s completely unacceptable for us to lose Kane for even a cent less than West Ham got for Rice.
I respect everyone has different feelings about this, but I’m not willing to settle for less than £105 million + add ons. Anything less is an insult.
It will be Maddison. Now he's at Spurs he will get more game time for England.We really need another English player to break through. Hopefully Devine o someone. Our English contingent is poor and one of the reason I don’t want Kane to go.