- Oct 28, 2004
- 38
- 284
This whole thing certainly makes the ‘Kane was instrumental in Poch being sacked’ rumour a lot more believable.
It seems they can't afford Kane on his own either
Kane is basically the polar opposite of Vinnie Chase. Kate Kane wouldn’t even be casted as an extra on Entourage
Harry Kane's rebellion: why he's doing it, Spurs' determination not to sell and the 'gentleman's agreement' Levy says never happened
Kane's moves to sign for Man City started a year ago. But the six-year deal he signed means Tottenham are determined not to selltheathletic.com
Can’t read the whole article but sounds like it will get even more poisonous.
what was the question ? or what did i say and i will answer it here ?
"...fine him if he does not return"?initial summary:
After an eventful day that Kane hopes will force Spurs’ hand and smooth the way for his desired move to Manchester City, The Athletic can reveal that:
- Kane spoke to a senior non-English Manchester City player prior to Monday to inform him of his desire to join the club.
- Some at City became aware over the weekend that Kane’s intention was not to train or play for Spurs again.
- After Monday’s no-show, Kane does not plan to return to Hotspur Way until he is granted his wish to leave.
- Tottenham’s position is that they will not sell to another Premier League club under any circumstances (as was the case when they moved on Luka Modric and Gareth Bale). Sources at the club also insist that no “gentleman’s agreement” has ever been made.
- Tottenham’s frustrations with Kane date back a year to when the striker’s post-holiday quarantining delayed his return to pre-season training and was perceived to have affected his performance on the opening weekend against Everton.
- During the same summer, City held a strong interest in signing Kane until their attention was diverted to Lionel Messi.
- Senior City sources have spoken of their expectation for “big signings” beyond the anticipated £100-million acquisition of Jack Grealish. They remain confident that a deal can be done for Kane.
- Senior Spurs figures are furious at the course of action Kane has taken and will fine him if he does not return.
If there was an agreement I find it impossible to believe that Levy put a financial figure on it. Especially for one of the world's top strikers in his prime for half the world record transfer fee. Just can't believe that part of it at all.If there was a gentleman's agreement that Kane could leave for a bid of £100m and Levy is now reneging on this agreement I don't blame Kane one bit.
The owners are the problem at this club, not Harry Kane.
It was 3 weeks from the final they get wasn't it? So they should all be due back yesterday. Not to mention players like GLC and Hojbjerg returned earlyReally hope this fiasco is firing up our lads for the opening game and we smash them. The England players from euros aren't due back at their clubs until next week so maybe Kane is the same...agree though that the silence speaks volumes and if he wasnt due back someone would have said something by now.
Reading the last few pages is horrific reading.
We all knew how Kane would need to push through a move. That doesn’t mean he loves the club any less.
This club have failed him. Failed to back managers and sign players to match his clear world class talent.
Once again as predicted. Once Kane goes it’ll be ‘Well done Levy on getting a good deal for a wantaway player’
seriously the only problem at our club is The owners. Not the player who lives and breathes this club
the player who has given so much. He is truly one of our own regardless of how this pans out.
we failed him.