- Oct 3, 2011
- 14,169
- 38,492
Not even that, but it's Top-tier moronic reporting.
Imagine being a reporter who can't read.
the names listed 2nd are the back-ups and sterling is listed underneath "ruben" [loftus-cheek].
Not even that, but it's Top-tier moronic reporting.
Imagine being a reporter who can't read.
Here's Mick Dennis saying what he'd do.. and Matt Law STILL defending his colleagues
I think he's right, fwiw. You don't have to report everything and this has not helped the relationship between team (and fans) and the media following them.
The replies are brilliant
they've successfully united fans of different clubs maybe tomorrow that'll be the story.The replies are brilliant
It's an interesting snapshot of how social media has altered ideas that have been part of the print media for decades. Personally I think it's fair game. They are there to report the news as opposed to being cheerleaders for the team. I find this far more acceptable than the prurient interest in the private lives of sportsmen and women.
I would too, but I’ll never underestimate their ability to put themselves above the needs of the national team. Maybe Southgate is pulling a fast one. We shall see.
Nice to see the England squad enjoying themselves. Very impressed with Southgate off the pitch. I hope he gets his tactics right on it as I don't want to see him crucified by the press at the end of the tournament.
Hated his appointment but he's grown on me. He's done with this squad what I (and I'm guessing a fair few others) wanted Roy to do at Euro 2016 and given the youths a chance to show what they can do.
Where have been Coopsie old chap?
Your GIFs have been sorely missed in the transfer forum.
You invite the press, they are going to snoop around in an inconvenient fashion. It goes with the territory. On the plus side, they won't be making that mistake again! Notes will be under lock and key. It's rather like when Roy Hodgson let some random guy on the tube know that he wouldn't be picking Rio Ferdinand. I bet he kept his trap shut on the tube after that.
People are thankfully by and large waking up to the fact that a zoom-lensed paparazzi style "revelation" doesn't deserve to be treated as anything else than an invasion of privacy.It's their job to hunt out the news. The person concerned found it. He did his job. I'm not sure that the reaction is remotely proportionate to the action.
I'm obviously out of touch with the current zeitgeist. Thank goodness though as folk are wetting themselves over nothing.