- Jun 8, 2009
- 21,658
- 23,476
He can't expect Leicester to accept a bid they believe is below his value without having time to find a replacement. Also none of that is an excuse for going awol from training before your team play a match. Four days running he hasn't turned up.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42918406
Agree - If City had come in at the start of the window, with a reasonable offer, I think Leicester would have let him go.
However, they had no interest in him until Sane got injured, and then only moved for him on the final day of the window, when Leicester had no potential replacement. If Ulloa hadn't already been shipped out, maybe they would have done a deal, but he had already gone.