What's new

The Weekend ITK Discussion Thread - 29/30 June 2013

Status
Not open for further replies.

SpainSpur85

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2011
245
529
I've noticed a lot of you are taking the 2nd of Sept off work for 'deadline day', it's really because it's my birthday isn't it? Are you throwing me a suprise party??
 

Parkie

Huge member
Jun 9, 2012
1,964
4,772
A Dutch friend thinks we should go for a guy called Douglas who plays in Holland and is Brazilian, never heard of him, any good?
Apparently he was available (is?) on a free and Newcastle had him all wrapped up and Kinnear canceled the deal because he had never heard of him.
 

jedimonkey

COYS!
Jan 28, 2011
1,849
4,230
Going back to the Swindon ITK, we had three players on loan there at the same time last season, so unless the rules have changed then I smell something fishy and it ain't my cock, as Mrs A&C keeps herself fresh.
 

WiganSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
16,026
32,758
If Douglas is on a free we should be all over that. Decent young defender and for nowt we can't go wrong. Especially if there are concerns over Kaboul.
 

EJWTartanSpur

SC Supporter
Jan 29, 2011
4,811
10,104
Ekotto wasn't great when he first came in but the only reason he may have ever ended up behind some of those names was due to a huge injury set back that last for 18 odd months plus !

Ifil - goodness me, there's a name from the not too distant past that I'd managed to erase from my memory !

I always think that fullbacks cantake longer to mature and become less error prone, because positioning and anticipation are so key to their game ie mental attributes that do continue to grow right through your career age irregardless.

Yes, any talented young buck fullback can bomb forward with the ball, offer an overlap and produce some good last ditch tackles, but knowing how to snuff out an electric winger or a technically talented inside forward is an art that requires much practice and growth.

The young fullback who possesses those gifts right from the start are few and far between, most likely intelligent and worth their weight in gold.

Maldini, Lahm spring to mind and as another example of a fullback who was solid from the start I think you can see how intelligent , in relative terms, Gary Neville has turned out to be in his punditry
 

CoopsieDeadpool

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2012
18,257
70,419
Should we get Crouchy back then because his International goal ratio is pretty good...?

Do you know how many of his caps were playing right back for England? If you do then we could do more of a fair comparison to Walker.

The funniest thing about Richards was when he played for England at 18. His main selling point according to the commentator was that he was 'fast enough to recover from his mistakes.' He is an athlete, but his all round footballing brain is non-existant, he's everything that BC says about Kyle Walker, only with Richards it's actually true.



For the first bit of bold, don't be ridiculous, S_B.. You know full well that I said MUCH more than just pointing out his caps. Where is Crouch playing now? Where has his footballing journey taken him? Would he be retained for 5 years after somebody with unlimited finances & access to (and employed) some of the biggest managers in the world, had taken over the club he was representing?

As for the second bold part, I've looked but couldn't find anything anywhere :(. However, considering Richards started out as a RB & gained pretty much all of his caps as a kid/youngster (though he's still very much a youngster), I'd hazard a guess that he got more caps at RB than Walker's current count of 4, and that was whilst competing with Gary Neville, not Glenn bloody Johnson.

As for the last part, apart from the bit that you quoted, that's just your own personal opinion, which just happens to be the opposite of my opinion & the opinion of Bus-conductor.

There is, however, one common denominator within our opinions. Pretty much EVERY defender is error-strewn when they are at the ages of Walker & Richards (as was pointed out just now in my response to Timberwolf, about Rose), even the great Ledgeley King needed someone to come in & iron out the creases.

EDIT: But I feel I/we should stop with this? After all, there's been no ITK on either of Walker, Crouch or Richards & I'm more than happy to remove the posts if it stops the thread from being closed.
 

SpurSince57

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2006
45,213
8,229
Should we get Crouchy back then because his International goal ratio is pretty good...?

Do you know how many of his caps were playing right back for England? If you do then we could do more of a fair comparison to Walker.

The funniest thing about Richards was when he played for England at 18. His main selling point according to the commentator was that he was 'fast enough to recover from his mistakes.' He is an athlete, but his all round footballing brain is non-existant, he's everything that BC says about Kyle Walker, only with Richards it's actually true.


Not to mention his worryingly persistent knee and ankle problems. Oh, and as far as I'm aware there has been absolutely no ITK linking us to him, a fact that A&C will doubtless point out at some juncture.
 

Breezer

Position??? Magician!!!!
Aug 27, 2004
4,387
29,887
This is a massive exaggeration. If we were this harsh on all of our young prospects none of them would ever break into the first team.

Yes, Sunderland were shit last season, but that doesn't make all of their players shit. Newcastle were equally dire, and they've got some brilliant players on their books. Rose was one of the few shining lights in an otherwise terrible team, and your reaction to that is essentially "it doesn't matter cos the rest of the team are shit"?. What does the lad need to do in your eyes? Drag the team to the top half with his barnstorming runs from LB? Maybe you didn't see him play, but on the few occasions I did he looked miles better than he did when he was last in a Spurs shirt: he's quick, tenacious, and, while far from great, showed he's got the qualities to make it at the top level. Based on BAE's form last season, to say that he's 100 times better is pure, unadulterated horse shit.

Now don't get be wrong, we'd be stupid to promote Rose to the first team straight away, but I think rotating him with BAE/another experienced LB makes perfect sense. We need to nurture the few prospects we have rather than writing them off based upon a couple of poor performances from a couple of years ago.

Oh, and it's worth noting that several journos have reported Liverpool have shown an interest in him.
Yep we can really see Liverpool replacing Enrique with Rose.
Your first paragraph sums it up for me. You say I'm being harsh and not many of our young prospects would ever get a chance. Reality check! That's because 95% aren't good enough to be playing for a top prem league team. Ledley King, Sol Scumball. How many other quality youth players have we blooded through. The same goes for Livermore! Not good enough for any top prem team. Don't get me wrong because I don't rate BAE but Danny Rose is not the answer to Left back. If we want to progress then we buy another quality left back and use BAE as cover.
 

Spurs_Bear

Well-Known Member
Jan 7, 2009
17,094
22,286
Not to mention his worryingly persistent knee and ankle problems. Oh, and as far as I'm aware there has been absolutely no ITK linking us to him, a fact that A&C will doubtless point out at some juncture.


I don't think he'll point it out, he'll just fist me.
 

Hoopspur

You have insufficient privileges to reply here!
Jun 28, 2012
6,334
9,703
Apparently he was available (is?) on a free and Newcastle had him all wrapped up and Kinnear canceled the deal because he had never heard of him.

DeGlas, farckin' Deuglas? You're farckin' 'aving a farckin larf. Don't want no farckin' Dooglis round 'ere. He's a farkin' **** that farkin' Duglis.....

...remind me who's that Douglas again? Oh, and get me that Kloop geezer on the blower....

Sorry, no ITK on Douglas though is there? :rolleyes:
 

Timberwolf

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2008
10,328
50,217
Yep we can really see Liverpool replacing Enrique with Rose.
Your first paragraph sums it up for me. You say I'm being harsh and not many of our young prospects would ever get a chance. Reality check! That's because 95% aren't good enough to be playing for a top prem league team. Ledley King, Sol Scumball. How many other quality youth players have we blooded through. The same goes for Livermore! Not good enough for any top prem team. Don't get me wrong because I don't rate BAE but Danny Rose is not the answer to Left back. If we want to progress then we buy another quality left back and use BAE as cover.

I'm not saying we need to give every prospect a run in the first team, but when a player impresses on loan at a why should our default reaction be to sell him because he's not good enough? I agree with you on Livermore, but he's shown over the course of 2 seasons that he's not good enough. Rose on the other hand has gone out on loan and impressed, much like Walker did (for a terrible Villa side, might I add), but you want to write him off. I don't get it.
 

YiddoInPoland

You got some statistical evidence to back that up?
Aug 6, 2011
3,049
6,438
itk a few days ago looks like it might happen, kickicking off in the player thread about the young croatian kid

EDIT: it was ITK from JJ
 

wiggo24

Well-Known Member
Jan 5, 2013
5,091
36,808
Jedvag thread going crazy, some reliable croatian paper says we've signed him and halilovic for 20m euros :D . Would be absolutely brilliant.

Sorry if this isnt allowed in here, but we've had ITK on these two so I thought it might be OK since its relatively big news. Will delete if necessary of course.
 

Breezer

Position??? Magician!!!!
Aug 27, 2004
4,387
29,887
I'm not saying we need to give every prospect a run in the first team, but when a player impresses on loan why should our default reaction be to sell him because he's not good enough? I agree with you on Livermore, but he's shown over the course of 2 seasons that he's not good enough- Rose on the other hand has gone out on loan and impressed, much like Walker did (for a terrible Villa side, might I add), but you want to write him off. I don't get it.
Walker ha always been a defender! Danny rose is playing left back because he's not good enough to play left wing. I understand what you're saying an maybe he does deserve some football at spurs. But IMO he would weaken our current team.
 

Timberwolf

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2008
10,328
50,217
Walker ha always been a defender! Danny rose is playing left back because he's not good enough to play left wing. I understand what you're saying an maybe he does deserve some football at spurs. But IMO he would weaken our current team.

Ok, fair enough. Personally I think it would be wasteful to not give him a chance, and the LB-LW thing doesn't really matter any more since he spent the entire season at Sunderland impressing at LB. By all means ship him out next summer if he doesn't cut it, but I struggle to see him being any worse than BAE was for the majority of last season (plus he's only 22 and has plenty of time to improve).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top