- May 28, 2013
- 1,680
- 5,231
I hope that GLC becomes so consistent and so good that we start to debate who the other two should be.
For me it depends on the oppo. Against top oppo who press high I’d go;Just a bit of fun, but when everybody is back and availble we'll have the best midfield depth, in terms of quality throughout , in the league imo.
So who'd you pick....
Mine would be:
Bentancur
Sarr
Maddison
Bissouma obviously can play 6 or 8, GLC 8 or 10 , and Kulusevski covers 10 as well.
Yeah, the numbers in the traditional sense barely apply here. A midfield three usually has either one holding and two box to box ( pivot and two mezzalas either side) or a double pivot and a hook/trequartista. The way we play with our best availability is essentially 4 mezzalas if you include the full backs, and one trequartista.I honestly have no idea what 6,8, and 10 mean, certainly when we have fucking full backs dominating our midfield.
maddisson, bentancur, bissouma
100% this. Having an ability to rotate or sub without a precipitous dropoff is something we really haven’t had in years (and perhaps ever).Whatever people's preference for a starting XI, the most exciting factor is the depth of talent we will have off the bench or for rotation.
Really? I think in Ange's system there's such a clear distinction between what each of the 3 midfielders are being asked to do.I honestly have no idea what 6,8, and 10 mean, certainly when we have fucking full backs dominating our midfield.