What's new

Whats wrong with this team?

buttons

Well-Known Member
Feb 24, 2005
2,945
3,861
Apart from the following facts the team is great:

- Kameni is a clown
- O Hara is half as good at left back than Bale, Lee or even Chimbonda
- Alves - we have more chance signing Etoo
- Etoo - we have more chance walking on the moon
- Woodgate....is not there!
 

brasil_spur

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2006
12,760
16,919
---------------kameni-------------

alves-----ben-haim---jarque----o'hara

lennon---diara-- -modric---malbaranque

----------eto'o-----keane----------

Alves will never join us, nor will we ever try and sign him now we have Hutton.

Where is Woodgate, he is already a Spurs legend in my books.

O'Hara sucks at LB, both Bale and Gilberto are ahead of him in the line-up.

Diara is spelt wrong (2 r's not one).

Malbranque isn't good enough to continue playing LW now we have Modric, Bale and Gilberto. He will likely become RW back-up to Lennon.
 

brasil_spur

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2006
12,760
16,919
Why o why do you have you got O'Hara in front of Bale and probably Gilberto, once fit. And picking the French tart who consistantly disappears up his own arse is equally baffling. Omitting Hutton stinks of naivety.

Based on what we've currently got, and all being available, then this should be a starting X1

1. Cerny
2. Hutton
3. Bale
4. Woodgate
5. King
6. Modric
7. Lennon
8. Jenas
9. Berbatov
10. Keane
11. Zokora

12. Robbo
13. Gilberto
14. Huddlestone
15. Taarbat
16. Bent

Cerny is on loan at the moment and we have definitley not offered an extension to this, he will be going back to Prague on July 1st.

We get 7 subs next season!
 

dirtydave

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2004
1,335
465
The answer is we would have the shortest Spurs team in living memory.

After a season of bad defending im surprised with many of the players we are linked with purely for their phyiscal stats, just wanted to point it out.
 

Clydey

New Member
Mar 9, 2008
76
0
trouble is Hutton can't be selected unless you drop Alves, or unless you wan't to play him out of position at LB which is unlikely

Bale should be played at LM and Lee at LB, much stronger side then IMO :wink:

with a natural left footer in Bale at LM, it then doesn't matter that Lee is right footed, it is only a problem when both players on the left have no left foot

Hutton > Alves

And obviously Bale over O'Hara, who is a disaster at right back.
 

41john

Member
Mar 4, 2007
217
0
I thought i had created a shite thread titled "king to be defensive midfielder" but this clearly tops it.

Why do we want Kameni?
--"---"---"----"---Alves?
Where is Woodgate, Hutton and Ledley?
Why have O hara at Left back when we Bale, lee, Ekotto or Chimbonda?
Malbranque needs replacing at left wing (maybe malbranque could replace lennon when in bad form)
Have faith that we can keep Berbatov, or if he is to leave be more realistic, we wont get Eto'o, maybe Villa if we are lucky.

Other than that Great job! :eek:mg:
 

yiddobrett

Ipswich Yid
Mar 18, 2005
3,859
3
1. No Hutton
2. No Woodgate
3. No King
4. O'Hara left back?!?!?!
5. Most inexperienced defence to ever grace the Premiership in terms of experience in the Premiership
6. Severe lack of height in the midfield and up front
7. Severe lack of a left foot in the whole time, bar O'Hara
8. Severe lack of strength up front
9. Do you actually think we have that much money?!

Stupidest thread I've seen for a while.
 

milkman

Banned
Oct 3, 2005
12,150
3
Whats wrong with it????

To much of this i think pal.......

Football-manager-2008.gif

bit of closet advertising here! :wink:
 
Top