I can't understand why any young player would go to Liverpool over us. Or any of the big clubs tbh. Weve had young player of the year 5 out of the last 6 seasons and proven we develop them.
Or can go to Chelsea, Man U or Man City and rot. Arsenal is probably the only sensible alternative, but who would want to walk into that shitstorm?
I can't understand why any young player would go to Liverpool over us. Or any of the big clubs tbh. Weve had young player of the year 5 out of the last 6 seasons and proven we develop them.
Or can go to Chelsea, Man U or Man City and rot. Arsenal is probably the only sensible alternative, but who would want to walk into that shitstorm?
Statements like this just doesn't sit well with me...okay we are a progressive club with a super manager, a new stadium about doing, nonetheless they're other great clubs and if a player chose another over us, they might view things differently.
Disagree. Unless your some wonderkid, you go to those clubs aged 25/26 after youve established yourself
He's a terrific prospect and very soon he'll be one of the best left backs in Europe but he's not there yet. Danny Rose is already one of the best left backs in Europe and we have great cover in Davies. For a lot of money he either needs to reinvent himself as a great left winger or we fear Rose might quit. I'm more worried about the right back position to be be honest.
And where their leader got his money from?And Chelsea need to be investigated on two fronts.
1) Number of players bought and loaned out (especially as they're ALWAYS wanted by their nearest rivals)
2) The unreasonable funds received for bang average players (fiddling FFP IMO)