- Aug 25, 2006
- 12,723
- 16,853
Disagree with this. I never had any dealings with the playing side of the club, but spent 3 years working on IT projects with them and they penny pinched constantly, even if it actually ended up costing them more. We offered numerous times to help re-design some of their IT architecture (for a cost) so that they could cope better with peak website loads, but they always pushed back on spending money as it wasn't in budget. One month (when we hired Jose) the website went down and then when it came back the peak load cost something like £20k for a couple of days hits due to the badly designed architecture. We'd previously offered to fix this for about £10k and they said it was too pricey.Loan to buy again points to us being completely skint.
It's a pretty naive attitude that the club has, in the short term it can help save costs, but a lot of the time it misses out on the bigger picture of costs being incurred. The above is just one of many examples like this, and I'm sure if they do this on the club side then they do this on the playing side too.
It doesn't mean that we're skint, just that those at the top don't see the value in spending a bit more up front when a few £ can be saved, even if it ends up costing them more in the end.