- Aug 25, 2011
- 22,420
- 80,759
DependsHmmm, would we be "happy" with Sissoko?
Actually added depth to a position we need depth in = happy
Or signed a player most people here don't rate = not happy
I'd personally be happy with it, not excitable happy
DependsHmmm, would we be "happy" with Sissoko?
... in 2017ali z: No to get you all excited but told to expect an incoming we will be happy with (not GNK or PAU)
Given how empty we look without Dembele, if it fits in that hole as a back up then it would be a good buy. Sometimes a player is not just about what he has individual, but what he can bring as part of the overall team package..Even £23m for Sissoko is outrageous...he played well in glimpses for France but wasn't anything special. He didn't exactly set the world alight at Newcastle either. From what I saw in the Euro's he was great at driving the ball forward but then didn't have the distribution at the end of his runs.
£23m to play second fiddle to the real Mousa...hmmmmmmm
ali z: No to get you all excited but told to expect an incoming we will be happy with (not GNK or PAU)
That got slammed about an hour ago, palGraeme Bailey (formerly of sky sports) now with HITC says wba offered cash + mcmanaman for sissoko
Bi polar does'nt even come close to describing this place on transfer deadline day
FFS....ali z: No to get you all excited but told to expect an incoming we will be happy with (not GNK or PAU)
think even A&C would waive his no images rule for that oneThat's like saying "not to give you an erection but here's a naked picture of Michelle Keegan"
That's like saying "not to give you an erection but here's a naked picture of Michelle Keegan"
ali z: No to get you all excited but told to expect an incoming we will be happy with (not GNK or PAU)
Oh FFS
*A&C removes my trousers again*