- Jul 7, 2012
- 38,247
- 104,143
Less possession means very little, we created countless chances and 4-1 flattered Liverpool, my point is that we can play three at the back with the right personnel, and that 4 at the back with no career DM to screen them is a risk against a side as fluid as wolves
Missed the point there a little ...We could afford to give up possession against Liverpool because they used to dominate territory, Wolves don't. They have decent technicians in the middle of the pitch but they are setup to break hence having 2 wing backs.
I really don't see how one game from last season has any bearing whatsoever on this season when the opponents and citcumstances couldn't be any more different, it's a strange comparison. There are counter examples where we destroyed mid table fodder like Wolves playing with 4 at the back so I really don't understand the sudden need for 3?