What's new

Player Watch: Victor Wanyama

chrissivad

Staff
May 20, 2005
51,646
58,072
My post said people are making out Dier was zidane last season. His amazing passing range, the way our teams tempo goes up, his wonderful long balls. Are we talking about Dier??

The post I quoted was someone saying yes to people calling him Zidane...

And I agree that there is a different tempo/style to our play from last season with Dier in cm to this season to Wanyama there.

Both have done a great job there in their own way, and I'm not surprised that the opinion on who should play there is split.
 

dudu

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2011
5,314
11,048
I really don't understand the Dier shouts, I think it's probably based on the fact that Dier is a bit of a favourite and people are a little frustrated that he's been displaced.
He was my adopted son last year.. I am a big fan but I'm not a very sentimental person when it comes to things like this.

Dier or Wanyama at DM offers us a great defensive presence and a solid attacking one.. I am comfortable with either playing in that position however I do not think Wanyamas inclusion has made us worse in any way shape or form.
 

millsey

Official SC Numpty
Dec 8, 2005
8,735
11,504
The post I quoted was someone saying yes to people calling him Zidane...

And I agree that there is a different tempo/style to our play from last season with Dier in cm to this season to Wanyama there.

Both have done a great job there in their own way, and I'm not surprised that the opinion on who should play there is split.
Surely that's people saying,what's the difference to last season, oh Dier not play dm, so that's the reason. How about Kane's 25 goals? Toby playing every game? Alli being far better?
 

chrissivad

Staff
May 20, 2005
51,646
58,072
Surely that's people saying,what's the difference to last season, oh Dier not play dm, so that's the reason. How about Kane's 25 goals? Toby playing every game? Alli being far better?

That's a reason. And one that's being discussed in here. I'm sure other reason are being talked about, but probably not in the Wanyama thread.

In here it's just focused in on this one thing
 

NEVILLEB

Well-Known Member
Nov 6, 2006
6,796
6,448
Hahaha. What a powerful response.
You have magical eyes that can see things no other can.

What like the difference between friction and fiction?

You might want to get your eyes tested.
 
Last edited:

NEVILLEB

Well-Known Member
Nov 6, 2006
6,796
6,448
Hahaha. What a powerful response.
You have magical eyes that can see things no other can.

In a way you've demonstrated my point by not noticing the spelling mistake.

The effect Dier has on the team is subtle and anyone who doesn't pay attention to details could miss it.
 

nightgoat

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2005
24,604
21,898
Ok fair.

No one is litterally saying that.

People are alluding that Dier is an obviously superior footballer and passer of the ball while without him at DM our entire offensive and defensive play is suffering.... This despite us having scored more and conceeded less than at this stage last year.

I am a huge fan of Eric's but him playing in DM is not the glue that holds us together.

There are some things that Wanyama does very well, but overall Dier is a far more accomplished footballer and fits into the style of play which was so successful last season much better (dropping back between the CBs, providing cover for the defence, making himself a viable passing option when building play from the back).

We haven't actually played that well very often this season. Apart from Man City we've only won league matches we would be expected to win. Compared with the corresponding fixtures last season we're only one point up because we didn't lose at home to Burnley, whereas our goal difference was better last season.

Of course there have been other factors such as injury and suspension to key players (although we weren't as injury free last season as people make out), but that just makes it more of an odd decision to consciously remove one of the most vital components of last season's team for no obvious benefit.
 

dudu

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2011
5,314
11,048
There are some things that Wanyama does very well, but overall Dier is a far more accomplished footballer and fits into the style of play which was so successful last season much better (dropping back between the CBs, providing cover for the defence, making himself a viable passing option when building play from the back).

We haven't actually played that well very often this season. Apart from Man City we've only won league matches we would be expected to win. Compared with the corresponding fixtures last season we're only one point up because we didn't lose at home to Burnley, whereas our goal difference was better last season.

Of course there have been other factors such as injury and suspension to key players (although we weren't as injury free last season as people make out), but that just makes it more of an odd decision to consciously remove one of the most vital components of last season's team for no obvious benefit.

You're making out like the gulf in performances, points and goals is dramatically different. It isnt.. If anything this season is fabourable to last in terms of points and GD and while flat at times we have also only lost 2

Kane and Toby fit for all games and we have 4+ points on what we do now in my opinion.

Dier starting doesn't make me believe that we would have turned our draws into wins.

I'm not saying it wouldn't have.... But I don't think we were missing him in DM vs west brom, Leicester.... We were missing clinical finishing and perhaps a few more threaded balls splitting the Defense.
 

Spurs' Pipe Dreams

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2011
20,008
32,728
imo he really needs to stop giving stupid fouls away around the box and needs to concentrate on his passing more, sometimes he's to lax and just gives the ball away. I rate him but he drifts too much and Dembele gets dragged back to cover when we need him dribbling and breaking defending teams lines.
 

Cravenspurs

Well-Known Member
Jul 31, 2011
2,864
3,680
Excellent read

http://cartilagefreecaptain.sbnatio...tics-tuesday-how-victor-wanyama-changed-spurs

Think 3-4-3 is the way to go if Wanyama is in the side

Yeah that was good, but could have sworn Dembele didn't play against Watford like the author continually writes in the write up. Either way the author is write that Wanyama is better alone as his game is dumbed down. If we go CM2 I would prefer Dier as I think he is just better on the ball and has a better range of passing.
 

nightgoat

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2005
24,604
21,898

thekneaf

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2011
1,936
3,888
Wanyama also goes hunting which Dier doesn't do. He splits the CBs. Hopefully we're getting to a formation that plays to as many players strengths as possible.
 
Top