What's new

Player Watch - Sergio Reguilón (Brentford)

JR1994

Well-Known Member
Jan 11, 2018
1,158
4,740
No idea why we’d include that clause. Literally just sorted them out until there better players come back. Ridiculous
 

Ben1

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2015
2,130
8,411
No idea why we’d include that clause. Literally just sorted them out until there better players come back. Ridiculous
Because he wouldn’t be gone otherwise and we want rid. The Cucarella deal fell through because wouldn’t include it.
 

wspur

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2021
868
3,130
No idea why we’d include that clause. Literally just sorted them out until there better players come back. Ridiculous
In another universe on SC - Levy is destroying the club, he is not letting deadwood go for cheap, why did he not accept United's half season loan deal?
 

JR1994

Well-Known Member
Jan 11, 2018
1,158
4,740
Because he wouldn’t be gone otherwise and we want rid. The Cucarella deal fell through because wouldn’t include it.
He could be back in January. Just sorted them out until Shaw and malacia are back from injury. If he’s any decent they get a good LB on the cheap for a season. We save a reported 50k ish a week..
 

JR1994

Well-Known Member
Jan 11, 2018
1,158
4,740
In another universe on SC - Levy is destroying the club, he is not letting deadwood go for cheap, why did he not accept United's half season loan deal?
They’re one of our biggest rivals for getting back into Europe.
 

0-Tibsy-0

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
11,344
44,148
Wow.

From Bad to worse.

Helping a rival out until they can do better. All because of shit planning and squad management.
 

Ben1

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2015
2,130
8,411
He could be back in January. Just sorted them out until Shaw and malacia are back from injury. If he’s any decent they get a good LB on the cheap for a season. We save a reported 50k ish a week..
Didn’t say I agree, just answering the question of why we included it.
 

Mr Pink

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2010
55,137
100,263
We need players out so how can anyone be annoyed with this....

Reg was OK, I thought he was poor defensively anyway. Good going forward.

Udogie is way ahead of him overall though.
 

Snuzzy

Well-Known Member
Jun 17, 2005
2,282
2,663
No idea why we’d include that clause. Literally just sorted them out until there better players come back. Ridiculous

I would like our approach to that clause to be, if he's doing well and playing regularly, we activate the clause ruthlessly.
 

Cel

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2013
712
1,854
Wow.

From Bad to worse.

Helping a rival out until they can do better. All because of shit planning and squad management.
But Regi isn't good - he's pretty much terrible? I'd rather they play him than ANY of the other LB options they have been linked to.
 

tabthx

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
88
379
I'm not his biggest fan at all but I'm surprised we weren't able to get a more favourable deal for him, surely he'd have been worth a punt on a permanent transfer for some clubs lower down the table?
 

wspur

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2021
868
3,130
Reggy to United is not helping them, don't you even remember how bad he was? He has to go. Feel sorry for him as I was very excited when he signed but it simply didn't work out, probably a victim of the high level footballing decisions.
 
Top