Relevant to this sentiment (which I support btw) is if people cast their minds back to 13/14 and just prior to when Poch took over. Danny Rose looked a shell of a player - crap defensively and mediocre going forwards. 18 months later he was arguably the best left back in the country.I made a conscious decision when ange was appointed to have a clean slate on players.
Yes we need to move some on, but I'm not making any judgements on them based upon the last 4 years of shite football.
I'm going to put my trust in Ange and see where it takes us. If Ange says get rid of someone like Kane, then we should just go with it and see where we end up.
I guess I'm "Trusting the process"
...shudder.
There’s been no news so people are making stuff up in their heads it seemsHave we pulled out or something? Feels like I’ve missed some news
You seem to be arguing that our current crop of CBs are of sufficient quality to remain in place. So for the record, do you think that none of Dier, Sanchez, Tanganga or Davies need to be upgraded? I mean, clearly our manager wants different personnel at CB; or else, why would Levy be negotiating for VDVen and Tapsoba? Just for shits and giggles?You do realize that virtually the same defence with the same players DID finish in the top 4 the season before last ????????
There’s been no news so people are making stuff up in their heads it seems
You seem to be arguing that our current crop of CBs are of sufficient quality to remain in place. So for the record, do you think that none of Dier, Sanchez, Tanganga or Davies need to be upgraded? I mean, clearly our manager wants different personnel at CB; or else, why would Levy be negotiating for VDVen and Tapsoba? Just for shits and giggles?
But the fact we’ve very publicly courted new CBs contradicts that. If as you say, the reason Levy hasn’t completed on VDV is because “Ange wants to give everyone a chance”, why was Levy negotiating for new CBs in the first place. We’ve had corroboration from 3 of our most trusted itks that the deal for VDV was completed last week. Surely that indicates that Ange has already concluded (what every supporter and his dog knows) that we do indeed require new personnel in the centre of a flat-back 4 high-line defence, otherwise he wouldn’t have sanctioned that much publicised search/negotiation for new CBs; or at least looked to keep it under wraps. Isn’t it more conceivable that, as per our most respected ITKs, a deal for VDV was finalised, but then Levy has tried to “renegotiate terms in our favour”. (And who knows, perhaps he’ll do just that and people will lord him for doing so.) But given the timeline of events, and Levy’s “previous” for trying to extract the maximum value from a deal, isn’t that more credible than “Ange wants to give Dier a change to to see if he can operate in a system for which he’s woefully unsuited”?Yes, but if he wants to give people a chance then he needs to give everyone an even chance.
There are no guarantees that signing VDV will be an upgrade, and perhaps Ange has seen enough in training to warrant giving them a couple of weeks on the training ground.
Including Rodon, who you've missed off the list.
It's what always happens! We didn't want to pay £35m for Mane so paid £30m for SissokoI just don't want us to find ourselves in a position where we end up paying as much for someone like Tosin as we sodding well would have for VDV or maybe even Tapsoba if desperate enough later on in the window. It's self-sabotage if we had this deal lined up and then backed out.
Why even bother negotiating for the f'ing player at all.
But the fact we’ve very publicly courted new CBs contradicts that. If as you say, the reason Levy hasn’t completed on VDV is because “Ange wants to give everyone a chance”, why was Levy negotiating for new CBs in the first place. We’ve had corroboration from 3 of our most trusted itks that the deal for VDV was completed last week. Surely that indicates that Ange has already concluded (what every supporter and his dog knows) that we do indeed require new personnel in the centre of a flat-back 4 high-line defence, otherwise he wouldn’t have sanctioned that much publicised search/negotiation for new CBs; or at least looked to keep it under wraps. Isn’t it more conceivable that, as per our most respected ITKs, a deal for VDV was finalised, but then Levy has tried to “renegotiate terms in our favour”. (And who knows, perhaps he’ll do just that and people will lord him for doing so.) But given the timeline of events, and Levy’s “previous” for trying to extract the maximum value from a deal, isn’t that more credible than “Ange wants to give Dier a change to to see if he can operate in a system for which he’s woefully unsuited”?
It's what always happens! We didn't want to pay £35m for Mane so paid £30m for Sissoko