- Jul 24, 2008
- 2,954
- 12,293
Now Ross jumps in...
Who knows what's actually going on...
Even if it’s bollocks, that’s better than the complete silence we’ve had for the past week or so ? ?
Now Ross jumps in...
Who knows what's actually going on...
Gaffney has done it again...
Gaffney has done it again...
We're in that zone of people trying to be the first to report it.The rumbles are coming out again (which is more calming than radio silence), but it still screams of the "lesser-sources" trying to jump the gun
We could always just ban Twitter completely. I remember when Twitter first became a thing and we had a thread debating wether or not to allow it. I was pretty much the only person who argued against it. You all got your way. Suffer bitches@Stoof @Rob @Archibald&Crooks can we put some coding in that changes the word Ricky Sacks to Nut Sacks that way we don't have to repeat the "is he reliable? no he is not !" discussion every few pages. People will see the words Nut Sack and instantly think Bollocks! and we can all move on
Now Ross jumps in...
Who knows what's actually going on...
In all seriousness we do need some sort of algorithm that flags Sacks tweets or any mention of their content. It’s really frustrating to see people who don’t realise discussing news only to see a couple of pages back that it’s sourced from some fabricated Sacks bollocks.@Stoof @Rob @Archibald&Crooks can we put some coding in that changes the word Ricky Sacks to Nut Sacks that way we don't have to repeat the "is he reliable? no he is not !" discussion every few pages. People will see the words Nut Sack and instantly think Bollocks! and we can all move on
Can I just ask @Archibald&Crooks is this okay? If it is then fair play and I apologise for calling @Yiddo1982 a ****.We are all aware that Vinny is an absolute Nkoudou of a forummer, aren’t we? A complete car crash....
But if it was banned what would everyone here be able to melt down about?We could always just ban Twitter completely. I remember when Twitter first became a thing and we had a thread debating wether or not to allow it. I was pretty much the only person who argued against it. You all got your way. Suffer bitches
The rumbles are coming out again (which is more calming than radio silence), but it still screams of the "lesser-sources" trying to jump the gun
And phonetically impossible because it sounds like slang for fartarse.No one with the name Gaffney has ever been cool. Its biologically impossible.
Or, we can just all agree not to post his bullshit on here and the mods can stay out of it as they already have other more pressing matters to deal with every transfer window.In all seriousness we do need some sort of algorithm that flags Sacks tweets or any mention of their content. It’s really frustrating to see people who don’t realise discussing news only to see a couple of pages back that it’s sourced from some fabricated Sacks bollocks.
Their arse probably, it’s the Daily Mail.Thanks, I'd still have fucked it up.
Not sure where they are getting it from though, can't find much even with shitty google translate on Mundo Deportivo