No mate, you miss the point entirely. I dont "love" him at all. I have no axe to grind. He's a millionaire footballer, he doesn't need my love.Your assertion that he isn’t average is incorrect, that is what makes it so. We could play this game all day long. I get it, you love Lamela. I like him, he tried hard and gave his all and respect for that. He was not a shit signing, he isn’t and hasn’t been a great signing either. He has been pretty middle of the road his whole Spurs career. Good luck to him in the future.
It's a forum mate - he's allowed to have an opinion on a player. Lamela has always been divisive so it's hardly like he's calling Kane or Son average.No mate, you miss the point entirely. I dont "love" him at all. I have no axe to grind. He's a millionaire footballer, he doesn't need my love.
My argument is purely with a) your assertion that he is average because he wasn't great in many games b) that your opinion that he was average is not backed up by any meaningful or measurable facts.
Therefore unless you can present anything more than just your opinion, you are demonstrably incorrect in both counts.
Don't agree. He may not have had many great games.....No mate, you miss the point entirely. I dont "love" him at all. I have no axe to grind. He's a millionaire footballer, he doesn't need my love.
My argument is purely with a) your assertion that he is average because he wasn't great in many games b) that your opinion that he was average is not backed up by any meaningful or measurable facts.
Therefore unless you can present anything more than just your opinion, you are demonstrably incorrect in both counts.
I couldn’t care less don’t worry.It's a forum mate - he's allowed to have an opinion on a player. Lamela has always been divisive so it's hardly like he's calling Kane or Son average.
Again, another missing the point.It's a forum mate - he's allowed to have an opinion on a player. Lamela has always been divisive so it's hardly like he's calling Kane or Son average.
Anyway, all the best Coco you beautiful mad eyed bastard!
Does not having many great games make him average? The very definition of average is never having any terrible or great games, just average one's. For me, he was rarely terrible, rarely great but very often good or at the very least as good as the rest of the team. Given that as a team we have performed above average or good in a large number of games in the last 6 years, it stands to reason that lamela must have at least been good on the whole.Don't agree. He may not have had many great games.....
Those are ‘your’ words in an earlier post, so I’m not even sure what point you are trying to make, it’s rather laughable that you then say someone else is demonstrably wrong.
Does not having many great games make him average? The very definition of average is never having any terrible or great games, just average one's. For me, he was rarely terrible, rarely great but very often good or at the very least as good as the rest of the team. Given that as a team we have performed above average or good in a large number of games in the last 6 years, it stands to reason that lamela must have at least been good on the whole.
If you were to say that he was never quite the player we hoped for. I would totally agree. But calling him average is both unfair and inaccurate in my opinion.
That is the point.
You have shifted to it being your opinion at least rather than a fact, which you are obviously entitled too. I’m season ticket holder have watched him (well I would say a lot but he hasn’t played a lot) he has for large parts been injured and a substitute. I admire his passion, his love of Spurs and his odd and I mean odd and occasional moments of skill. Unfortunately far outweighed by headless chicken tackling, wanting to much time on the ball, failure to pass very often when better options are available. He was a significant investment, he has been pretty average in his time at Spurs, I don’t think the pace of the premier league ever suited him (that’s not his fault) he is a better player when he has more time on the ball than he gets in this league. Good luck to him in his next adventure.Does not having many great games make him average? The very definition of average is never having any terrible or great games, just average one's. For me, he was rarely terrible, rarely great but very often good or at the very least as good as the rest of the team. Given that as a team we have performed above average or good in a large number of games in the last 6 years, it stands to reason that lamela must have at least been good on the whole.
If you were to say that he was never quite the player we hoped for. I would totally agree. But calling him average is both unfair and inaccurate in my opinion.
That is the point.
Yes, was a poor choice of words. Perhaps I should have said had very few poor or great games, which is what I said originally.I don't think it does.
You can still have the odd great or poor game and still be an average player.
You can have a poor game, and still be a great player.