What's new

Over half of Jewish Spurs fans in survey disagree with club’s attempt to stop Y-word

mawspurs

Staff
Jun 29, 2003
35,110
17,804
Tottenham Hotspur Supporters Trust say 52 per cent of fans identifying as Jewish who completed their poll 'strongly disagreed or disagreed' with club's attempt to get their fans to 'move on' from using the Y-word

Source: Jewish News
 

greaves

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2006
6,171
9,078
Tottenham Hotspur Supporters Trust say 52 per cent of fans identifying as Jewish who completed their poll 'strongly disagreed or disagreed' with club's attempt to get their fans to 'move on' from using the Y-word

Source: Jewish News
52/48. Where have I seen that before??
 

Spawn

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2004
94
326
Apologies read the article


52% of fans who identified as Jewish strongly disagreed or disagreed, with 30% agreeing.

Some 36% of all respondents strongly disagreed or disagreed, with 35% agreeing and 29% neither agreeing or disagreeing.
 

Japhet

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2010
19,277
57,638
Isn't the point that it's probably offensive to a huge majority of Jewish people who aren't Spurs supporters or have no interest in football? Our supporters have taken ownership of what is intrinsically a very offensive term to deflect it's effect. Doesn't work for anyone else though.
 

whitesocks

The past means nothing. This is a message for life
Jan 16, 2014
4,652
5,738
Of course that doesn't mean that the 30% of jewish fans were actually offended - they will all know the history of the chants.
But out of context, it is perhaps not a word they want in circulation and whatever the majority want perhaps consideration should be given to their view.

What will stick in the throat is that a hypocrite like baddiel will comment 'about time too', as he sits in a stand of fascists in their nazi shorts, hissing under their breath.
 

cusop

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2010
1,092
188
Of course that doesn't mean that the 30% of jewish fans were actually offended - they will all know the history of the chants.
But out of context, it is perhaps not a word they want in circulation and whatever the majority want perhaps consideration should be given to their view.

What will stick in the throat is that a hypocrite like baddiel will comment 'about time too', as he sits in a stand of fascists in their nazi shorts, hissing under their breath.
I understand exactly what you are saying. Without reading the article is there any delineation between armchair fans and attending fans?
A dad and his 7 ish old son sat next to me last season and the lad started chanting 'Yid army', How can anything change when the next generation identifies the term with spurs.
 

ralvy

AVB my love
Jun 26, 2012
2,511
4,628
Isn't the point that it's probably offensive to a huge majority of Jewish people who aren't Spurs supporters or have no interest in football? Our supporters have taken ownership of what is intrinsically a very offensive term to deflect it's effect. Doesn't work for anyone else though.
Who. gives. a. fuck?
 

Metalhead

But that's a debate for another thread.....
Nov 24, 2013
25,413
38,427
It's a bit of a weird one. It doesn't bother me personally - it would bother my Dad who remembers hearing that in a sinister way. Were it black people chanting the N word, would I join in? Definitely not.
 

Col_M

Pointing out the Obvious
Feb 28, 2012
22,786
45,888
You lot are too focused in stats. If Conte wants Niko that’s good enough for me.
 

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,604
205,191
Here we go again.

I don't think it'll be completely eradicated for a very very long time, (if at all) and this is going to be a small steps thing at best and if the authorities or the club think people are going to stop en masse, good luck with that.

But I get the argument against. I made my own choice a while ago and personally, wouldn't chant the word again and to be honest i'm not entirely sure when the last time was that I even typed the word.

But a lot of people are going to feel they should keep using it and I understand that too. It's a tough one, there are shades of right all over the place and we've been here so many times on this. Pretty much all the arguments have been made so many times that we just end up going around in circles and getting pissy with eachother :(
 

Tiberius Gracchus

Well-Known Member
Jan 22, 2004
746
1,822
As someone who has chanted with pride at the ground but am now uncomfortable with it, i think there's a solution here, without an outright ban or continuation.

If it's offensive to some - and given the recent past we should treat this with senstivity - then it shouldn't require an overall majority.

When Greenpeace were accused of stealing First Nation(s) imagery and cukture for their logo, they worked with them and came up with a new logo that still incorporated asoects of it but didn't trample all over First Nation views.

Perhaps the club could work with various Jewish bodies and find a suitable alternative that reflects pride in the club's Jewish roots but without using such a divisive word
 
Top