What's new

Next DoF

beats1

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2010
30,040
29,630


I know POK isn't popular round here but George Bannister is usually fairly clued in isn't he?

Im sorry but I'm not buying/liking this at all

We had a committee and it started the dysfunction within the club as there wasn't one clear vision

Paratici rightly or wrongly set out the plan for others to follow, going back to a committee format imo is undoing the only thing right in the last 2 years

Regardless of people feeling alienated or frozen out, the results haven't been good for us in that poch to Mourinho period regarding club structure and the clubs philosophy has been convoluted

The next DoF style needs to be implemented throughout the club like we were in 2005 to 2014
 

YB123

YB123
Aug 27, 2006
6,077
21,850


I know POK isn't popular round here but George Bannister is usually fairly clued in isn't he?

no idea why POK isnt. He's reliable. Can be obvious but he also says whether its his personal opinion or not. He also praised SC for being ahead with the Slot news. Think that George guy gets same updates?
 

Now it's Spursonal

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2012
1,687
13,970
Who's Midas :D
Guy from Twitter that gets teamsheets right, had Bissouma in the training ground before anyone even knew of the possibility of signing him, and was first to mention the possibility of Johannes Spors.

Completely understand if you only want info from sources that you can verify yourself though👍
 

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,691
205,811
Guy from Twitter that gets teamsheets right, had Bissouma in the training ground before anyone even knew of the possibility of signing him, and was first to mention the possibility of Johannes Spors.

Completely understand if you only want info from sources that you can verify yourself though👍
We ask that aggregators aren't used as sources, so if an aggregator posts something and cites a credible source, we would prefer it if people went to that source and quoted that. It might be a small thing but it massively helps filter out the bollocks.

Unfortunately posting some guy from twitter is a no-no. And the reason for that is, you wouldn't believe the kind of Twitter account that people will attach credibility to, everyone thinks they have a handle on who'd reliable and why and once you let that slip, it opens the door for all sorts of shit, unfortunately, there can't be grey areas. This all bounces back to why we ask for reliable or credible media sources only. Work any other way and there'd be even more pigshit in here than there already is :D

Meh, some people will understand it, some won't (And I can guess who :D)

Having said all that, if I had my way there'd be no Twitter in here at all. The day that happens I will honestly whop my old chap out and slap it across the nearest old biddy's chops. Fuck the court order.
 

Bluto Blutarsky

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2021
15,370
71,418
Im sorry but I'm not buying/liking this at all

We had a committee and it started the dysfunction within the club as there wasn't one clear vision

Paratici rightly or wrongly set out the plan for others to follow, going back to a committee format imo is undoing the only thing right in the last 2 years

Regardless of people feeling alienated or frozen out, the results haven't been good for us in that poch to Mourinho period regarding club structure and the clubs philosophy has been convoluted

The next DoF style needs to be implemented throughout the club like we were in 2005 to 2014
I agree - it also removes accountability.

There should be a singular voice that ultimately takes responsibility for the players we sign (or don't sign).
 

Now it's Spursonal

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2012
1,687
13,970
We ask that aggregators aren't used as sources, so if an aggregator posts something and cites a credible source, we would prefer it if people went to that source and quoted that. It might be a small thing but it massively helps filter out the bollocks.

Unfortunately posting some guy from twitter is a no-no. And the reason for that is, you wouldn't believe the kind of Twitter account that people will attach credibility to, everyone thinks they have a handle on who'd reliable and why and once you let that slip, it opens the door for all sorts of shit, unfortunately, there can't be grey areas. This all bounces back to why we ask for reliable or credible media sources only. Work any other way and there'd be even more pigshit in here than there already is :D

Meh, some people will understand it, some won't (And I can guess who :D)

Having said all that, if I had my way there'd be no Twitter in here at all. The day that happens I will honestly whop my old chap out and slap it across the nearest old biddy's chops. Fuck the court order.
In this scenario, the aggregator actually is the only source of the info as the source uses him in a way similar to the Goat is used here.
But I understand that it opens a can of worms when it comes to posting sources from Twitter so won’t mention him in the future👍
 
Top