He's definitely good, that's a fact, plus he can cover any of front 3 and even more positions. Ideally we get another left footer to compete with Kulusevski but he's a good player, and Son can't be relied on anyway.
Almirons on a similar purple patch season and scored 9 goals and I’ve not seen 1 post saying we should be in for him... My point is if there wasn’t a link to him (with no other links out there) nobody on here would have even considered him before the window opened.
His agent is trying to move him offered out to everyone, Gives me Steven Pienaar vibes
Appreciate the info as always mate but as I posted previously, he’s levels above Pienaar.His agent is trying to move him offered out to everyone, Gives me Steven Pienaar vibes
? also he’s an exciting player, again something we don’t have much of in our squad.I think as a rotstion option if he’s cheap then fine. But my big worry is succession planning for Son. Just need to find a truly pacey threat againAppreciate the info as always mate but as I posted previously, he’s levels above Pienaar.
Pienaar 20 goals in 200 games for everton
Trossard 25 goals in 115 for Brighton and he’s much more of an overall threat, more creative.
Each to their own but when people are saying things like this I’d question how much they’ve properly watching Trossard closely, fwiw i think he’d be an excellent addition, versatile and would add creativity we much need
Yep absolutely agree mate, he’s not a succession plan for Son but he’d be much needed quality depth and creativity that we need now.
Yeah almost as a Kane replacement too. I think I would push Richarlison up as a 9 and sign a top class left winger - with a competent back up as a 9 until Scarlett is ready.
Yeah i agree, i feel we would be better off putting money towards and elite prospect LWF then getting a stop gap, which Trossard would be really.
we have a a truly pacey threat already, who has been mainly starved of opportunities due to the lack of creativity in recent line-up's. The number of angled runs he made in behind in the first half v Villa only for colleagues to pass sideways or backwards showed this and his determination not to give up.
I agree with you and personally really rate Trossard.Appreciate the info as always mate but as I posted previously, he’s levels above Pienaar.
Pienaar 20 goals in 200 games for everton
Trossard 25 goals in 115 for Brighton and he’s much more of an overall threat, more creative.
Each to their own but when people are saying things like this I’d question how much they’ve properly watched Trossard closely, fwiw i think he’d be an excellent addition, versatile and would add creativity we much need
No, he’s just a good player who’s shown very good form for the last 12 months and people think he’d be a smart signing given his quality, versatility and fit for our system. He’s a class little player, I’d be very happy if we signed him
This is it for me really, look at Arsenal, they have Martinelli, who's been excellent this season, and Smith-Row who both play LWF but are about to bring in Mudryk because they believe he could be an elite, world class, player in a few years. Now obviously one shouldn't base one's own business on others and i don't necessarily think we need to be spending £100 mil on a LWF but if we really want to challenge for the league we need to change our mentality of buying players just to be back up, rotation players. In my opinion any player we bring in should ether be ready to straight away challenge for a starting spot or be considered a special prospect who will one day. Personally i think that is the only way we will ever improve as a team and get to the point of challenging for titles.
