- Aug 31, 2012
- 4,026
- 10,553
that's a big if isn't it?If City offer £150m straight cash for Kane, and we could get Martinez, Vlahovic and a CM (maybe Zakaria) for that money, would you do it???
FWIW I would.
that's a big if isn't it?If City offer £150m straight cash for Kane, and we could get Martinez, Vlahovic and a CM (maybe Zakaria) for that money, would you do it???
FWIW I would.
We would also need a 10 to replace Kane though. Someone in the Alli position who can pull the strings. Kane took that role over when Eriksen left so we would be losing that. I really think for Kane it should be 150m plus bonuses rising closer to 200m. If we could get to that sort of money then we could stretch to say Damsgaard in addition to Vlahovic and Martinez. I really think you need a 9 and a 10 to replace Kane and Martinez is neither. Although Martinez would make up for the loss of Bale in terms of goals and assists.If City offer £150m straight cash for Kane, and we could get Martinez, Vlahovic and a CM (maybe Zakaria) for that money, would you do it???
FWIW I would.
I'd accept £140m. Might seem low but with clubs really struggling financially this summer that would be the equivalent of at least £40m more.that's a big if isn't it?
What I like about the ‘painful rebuild’ is we are targeting largely U23 players who have potential to get even better with us and provide us with a solid foundation for years to come, rather than 28/29 yr olds who are being let go from elite clubs and we believe they can bring experience and mentality, but don’t factor in it’s short term. I get the need for the odd experienced addition like Naybet and Davids for what they bought, but that should be the odd player, in the main young players on the up should be out path.
In a heartbeat.
Really? Can you guarantee they’ll score as many together as Kane did on his own?
Really? Can you guarantee they’ll score as many together as Kane did on his own?
Are you telling me that swapping (not that simple, I know) 1 x sulky, weak-ankled, 28 year old striker, whose value will now diminish by each passing year, for 2 x young forwards and a CM, does not make us a more rounded squad, and makes us less reliant on a single player?
Are you telling me that swapping (not that simple, I know) 1 x sulky, weak-ankled, 28 year old striker, whose value will now diminish by each passing year, for 2 x young forwards and a CM, does not make us a more rounded squad, and makes us less reliant on a single player?
I think we can safely say this won't happen now.
I think we can safely say this won't happen now.