- Feb 13, 2006
- 10,527
- 8,052
Modelling the new Arg kit with a few other average players...
Modelling the new Arg kit with a few other average players...
Read the rest of my comments. I never once said he was poor in the Sherriff match. I said he had shown nothing to suggest he was worthy a start up until then.He's made just 4 league appearances since he joined, all as sub.
1. Arsenal - On as 75th min sub
2. Norwich - On as 83rd min sub
3. Cardiff - On as 73rd min sub
4. Chelsea - Didn't play
5. West Ham - 63rd min sub
6. Aston Villa - Didn't play
7. Hull - Didn't play
8. Everton - Didn't play
9. Newcastle - Didn't play
He's had a total of 66 mins of premier league action since he joined us.
I would have liked to have seen a lot more of him before I decided he was 'poor' or couldn't help the team.
He was by all accounts the best player against Sheriff recently but still didn't get on the pitch against Newcastle so I don't know why you've said he was poor whenever he played. Simply not true.
0 assists and one fluky goal hardly warrants a run of 9 games either imo.Read the rest of my comments. I never once said he was poor in the Sherriff match. I said he had shown nothing to suggest he was worthy a start up until then.
One assist against a the tiring defence of a newly promoted team hardly warrants a start above Townsend IMO
How do you know it's not true? I just heard that exact stat in a video from Trans World Sport, which profiled the boy when he was 12 and it was actually "over 120 goals." Maybe this video hasn't been mentioned yet in this thread, or even anywhere in SC, but here it is anyway. GO TO 0.49
I wouldn't be remotely surprised if Lamela started on the right tonight, given that he was excellent in Argentina's last match against Uruguay.
If he's good enough to start for Argentina, why isn't he good enough to start for Spurs? Andre needs to insert him in the line-up against City and United. Waiting until December, when we're in 8th place in the table and devoid of ideas going forward, is too late.
Why do Argentina even bother with a new kit?
Sorry, but it's still a lie. Maybe it's his total amount of goal in all the years as a youth at River, but certainly not in a season. It would've reached the news here, and it didn't. There's a player nowadays at River (Federico Andrada), who has the same age than Erik when he left, that holds the record for youth goals in all the seasons, he's a striker, and he never even scored 60 goals in a season. Plus Erik was not a starter in the youth sides until he was 16.
Perform better in prem matches than Lamela had in league cup/Europa league matches.
And for all of those better performances leading to starting every game, he still has as many premier league assists as Lamela does.
Apart from that one assist against a tired relegation struggling defence what else has he done before the Sheriff match?
Townsend has made a positive contribution to most matches up until recently. In fact, the whole reason he got his chance was because of a MOM performance in a Europa league match where he scored and created a further 2 - Lamela was struggling to even perform in those games!
He is in a new country with no friends, can't speak the language, in a league which is the polar opposite to serie A. It will take time for him to adjust.
To try and claim before the Sheriff match that he deserved to be in the team ahead of Towbsend on merit is absolute bullshit. If you actually watched the performances rather than reel off a useless stat you will have seen Townsend set up plenty of chances for team mates that weren't converted. Put opposition defences on the back foot due to his direct running, giving us attacking impetus and generally be our most threatening player.
Lamela on the other hand has looked lost in most matches. Has dallied on the ball too long and been dispossessed easily. Misplaced simple passes to team mates, looked scared to dribble with the ball and has been going to ground far too easily.
Players should be in the team on merit like when Townsend proved his worth in the Europa league. We all want Lamela to do well but he has to earn his place and up until the Sheriff match he hadn't done that.
The cardiff goal was created out of Quick passing and guile between Lamela and Holtby.Apart from that one assist against a tired relegation struggling defence what else has he done before the Sheriff match?
Townsend has made a positive contribution to most matches up until recently. In fact, the whole reason he got his chance was because of a MOM performance in a Europa league match where he scored and created a further 2 - Lamela was struggling to even perform in those games!
He is in a new country with no friends, can't speak the language, in a league which is the polar opposite to serie A. It will take time for him to adjust.
To try and claim before the Sheriff match that he deserved to be in the team ahead of Towbsend on merit is absolute bullshit. If you actually watched the performances rather than reel off a useless stat you will have seen Townsend set up plenty of chances for team mates that weren't converted. Put opposition defences on the back foot due to his direct running, giving us attacking impetus and generally be our most threatening player.
Lamela on the other hand has looked lost in most matches. Has dallied on the ball too long and been dispossessed easily. Misplaced simple passes to team mates, looked scared to dribble with the ball and has been going to ground far too easily.
Players should be in the team on merit like when Townsend proved his worth in the Europa league. We all want Lamela to do well but he has to earn his place and up until the Sheriff match he hadn't done that.
The point is his positive contributions haven't amounted to anything. The definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing and expect different results. It is a matter of meritocracy as a whole, not just on an individual players basis. The team hasn't performed well, so change the parts. Townsend has not produced any goals, nor any assists, so it is past time we tried something else.