Hudd!

[opensaysme]

Huddlestone should of been first out of the door in the summer.

Hopefully Livermore can step up and oust Hudd in the January TW.

 

[Sputic]

Huddlestone's 'quality' passing is a figment of people's imagination. He's neither incisive or consistent. O'Hara's a better passer of the ball.

Huddlestone just looks more stylish when he does it, but he's not good at it.

 

[beats1]

Huddlestone should of been first out of the door in the summer.

Hopefully Livermore can step up and oust Hudd in the January TW.

R U fucking serious or just taking the piss

 

[teok]

Huddlestone's 'quality' passing is a figment of people's imagination. He's neither incisive or consistent. O'Hara's a better passer of the ball.

Huddlestone just looks more stylish when he does it, but he's not good at it.

Disagree totally, Hud has far more ability and technique.

 

[diegooners]

People who are saying Livermore or O'Hara are comparable to Huddlestone are clearly on L.S.D. Where can I get some?

 

[opensaysme]

R U fucking serious or just taking the piss

I AM fucking serious.

Huddlestone sucks monkey balls.

We should of kept Jermaine Jenas.

 

[beats1]

I AM fucking serious.

Huddlestone sucks monkey balls.

We should of kept Jermaine Jenas.

:rofl:, one of our best midfielders from the CL qualifying season should of gone before O'Hara, Wilson and jenas

The player is going through bad patch because of his ankle injury atm but he is very important for us, even with his injury problems we only lost 2 matches with him in the team last season, which were west ham and blackpool away and in those matches the strikers had 40 shots on goal

 

[kremlyn]

My head hurts. Let me make this simple.

Harry and Levy spent the summer trying to offload JJ; despite the fact that Hudd had still not recovered from a serious injury and despite the fact that JJ was quite happy to sit on the bench and not make a fuss.

Conclusion: They must rate JJ less than an injured Hudd.

Modric was causing all kinds of bother and could still agitate for a move in Jan so midfield cover is probably a good idea; they let JJ go and promoted Livermore instead.

Conclusion: They must rate Livermore higher than JJ.

JJ went out on loan. Unlike O'hara who easily attracted a 5.5m sale. I haven't even heard a rumour of an actual bid for Jenas bar something sketchy from Stoke.

Conclusion: Draw your own.

Thudd actually gels with Modric in CM and does quite well with Palacios but Jenas has never consistently (there's that word again) performed with anyone. His pairing with Zokora was my nadir this millenium as neither of them had a clue how to make the game their own.

This "Jenas is better than Thudd" is just the whimpering of poor losers from a debate you just can't admit you've already lost. JJ may come back next year so maybe then there'll be some point in continuing this puerile and futile argument.

 

[jonathanhotspur]

Did I read somewhere that Jenas's contract is up next summer?

 

[kernowspur]

Hudd is just not a first choice in our midfield. Modric, Sandro when fit and Parker are in front of him and Livermore will push him this season.

 

[opensaysme]

R U fucking serious or just taking the piss

:rofl:, one of our best midfielders from the CL qualifying season should of gone before O'Hara, Wilson and jenas

The player is going through bad patch because of his ankle injury atm but he is very important for us, even with his injury problems we only lost 2 matches with him in the team last season, which were west ham and blackpool away and in those matches the strikers had 40 shots on goal

Huddlestones only ever looked good in one season.

I never said O'hara is better than Huddlestone.

Jenas is more consistent. Has better energy levels. Scores more goals. Makes more assists.

I'd prefer a quartet of Jenas, Palacios, Sandro and Parker to be honest.

They bring more dynamism and a healthy balance to our central midfield.

Obviously now we have to make do with what's left.

I believe that Livermore will score more goals and have more assists than Huddlestone this season.

 

[Davo99]

I still think Hudd's future at Spurs lies in the centre of defence. It makes perfect sense.

 

[jonathanhotspur]

I still think Hudd's future at Spurs lies in the centre of defence. It makes perfect sense.

Pass the joint, jam-fingers.

 

[kaz Hirai]

I still think Hudd's future at Spurs lies in the centre of defence. It makes perfect sense.

painfully slow over short distance, long distance, on the turn and not good in the air, he would be like a nightmare bizzaro dawson

 

[milli.com]

According to insiders at Tottenham the Hudd is rated as the best player at the club even ahead of modric but the problem is that he does,nt reproduce his form in training in real matches anyone who has inside info can verify this.