What's new

Harry Kane

eddiev14

SC Supporter
Jan 18, 2005
7,174
19,688
You’ve got to imagine any new manager with a brain would demand the club keep Kane in their first season. Coming into a club that has just lost their talisman and top goalscorer makes the job even harder than it already is
 

GMI

G.
Dec 13, 2006
3,118
12,210
There are five champions league spots from next year so keeping Kane to help us get one of those (will still be hard) would offset the loss in transfer fee.
 

Ron Burgundy

SC Supporter
Jun 19, 2008
7,746
23,425
There are five champions league spots from next year so keeping Kane to help us get one of those (will still be hard) would offset the loss in transfer fee.
Fair. It’s still a risk though.

An alternative would be selling, better backing a new manager and having the value in those players even if we don’t get CL. If spent well (big IF) we could get two or three really good players.

It’s a tough call but I think I’d sell for the right price. Losing him for free would be a disaster. We had the same with Eriksen (sort of) and Campbell. Can’t happen for a club like us
 

ukdy

Well-Known Member
Jan 11, 2007
1,315
5,109
Moneyball it... if we lose Kane, we somehow need to replace what he gives. So far this season in a terrible/terribly set up team that's 24 goals and 3 assists. Ideally we do that with an exact replacement, or a couple of replacements. Not as easy as it sounds given our recent recruitment woes.

So keep him, roll the dice with a new manager bounce, improve the team and make very very sure we finish top 5 next year to get CL. Negotiate a HUGE new deal, LOTS of money still living locally and adored by all, club legend, win the individual awards, set the individual records, get a greater say/input in the club activities, have a statue, get appointed club captain.. that should all be as a bare minimum.
 

makeveli

Well-Known Member
Aug 2, 2012
885
2,079
I’ve actually had enough of harry Kane and his bigger than us , just go and leave us to build a team not just around you. We need to start fresh and rebuild the whole structure of the squad so it’s not built around kane
All the dislikes and all the wtf , you will realise what I’m talking about and how this club is what it is when he goes
 

DenverSpur

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2011
2,020
5,675
This is why, out of all the rival clubs we deal with, Man Utd fans will, and always shall, be the biggest ****s of the lot to me. I remember them through the 90s and 00s. Plastic, cockney Red's, entitled as fuck. There's no other fan base who would act as up themselves as that.
Hate them with a vengeance.
 

DenverSpur

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2011
2,020
5,675
Did you think this through before you wrote it? We would be fighting relegation almost if it wasn’t for Kane this season.
You don’t know that that’s just sensationalism. We might not have a 20 goal a season striker but If we didn’t have Kane we would have someone( or more than one) else in his place. The chemistry of the team would be different, maybe goals would be spread out more among more players.. There’s nothing to say it wouldn’t be successful.
 

DenverSpur

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2011
2,020
5,675
I can go back to Mackay, White, Greaves etc and I would say Kane is our greatest ever player. He has carried this club almost on his own for so many seasons.
Sorry, no offense, but I think you’re out of your mind. He’s scored goals for us, lots of them, but he’s not single handedly carried the club.
 

Frozen_Waffles

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2005
3,784
9,630
I'd actually say he's improved and we have the best version of Harry Kane at the moment. The fact even Haaland who is an absoloute machine is still not as good as Kane tells all.

He's given us everything here and if he goes in the Summer or in a year, good luck to him.

Truly world class, when he goes we are going to be right up shit creek. I like Richarlison and he's had a bit of bad luck in front of goal, but it's like replacing Berbatov with Frazier Campbell.
 

DenverSpur

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2011
2,020
5,675
Yes he has.

Without him we'd be fighting relegation.
No he hasn’t. I was replying to a poster who said
“He has carried this club almost on his own for so many seasons”
That statement is blatantly untrue.
It’s true that if this season he’d been unavailable through injury we would have struggled because few others were contributing goals but let’s not stretch it for all the preceding seasons he’s been here.
 

jolsnogross

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2005
3,792
5,569
You don’t know that that’s just sensationalism. We might not have a 20 goal a season striker but If we didn’t have Kane we would have someone( or more than one) else in his place. The chemistry of the team would be different, maybe goals would be spread out more among more players.. There’s nothing to say it wouldn’t be successful.
There's an awful lot to say it wouldn't be successful. He has 24 league goals and 8 assists in this league season. That covers more than half our goals. It's easy to imagine something filling that gap in his absence, but that's the bigger leap than thinking we'd be in the shit. The next 6 highest scorers get to 24 goals, and most of those have 2 each. So we'd be looking for a lot for an current player or players to fill the gap. And you've seen how we spend money on new players...I don't think anyone would be confident in that working out well.

He'll have to be replaced at some point. But the idea we'd be in a similar position, and not miles worse off, without our most consistently high performing player for many years now is nonsense. Especially this horrible season.
 

DenverSpur

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2011
2,020
5,675
How can someone watch us this season and say this with a straight face. Lmao.
Pretty easy. I’ve been watching Tottenham for 60 odd years so I’ve learned to put things in perspective.

Harry Kane is a great goal scorer and we’ve been lucky to have him come through our academy but I don’t think he’s even close to being our greatest ever player. I don’t even think he’s our greatest goal scorer. I still give that honor to Jimmy Greaves. Greaves scored in the big games(1962 FA Cup Final, 1963 European Cup Winners Final) whereas Harry unfortunately for all his goals has failed to score in the big games he’s been part of.
That’s not me slagging him off just being realistic. I get tired of so many people putting him on a pedestal like some superhero or god who has done no wrong. He’s been cursed that the club, during his time here, has been run badly at the top which is a huge factor in our lack of trophies but that does change the fact that he has also been a contributing factor in our lack of success. It can’t just be everybody else’s fault but not his that we’ve not won anything while he’s been here.

If and when he goes it will leave a big hole to be filled but we’ve lost important players before and survived and even prospered.
Like I said I’ve learned to put things concerning Spurs in perspective. But you don’t have to agree.
 

DenverSpur

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2011
2,020
5,675
There's an awful lot to say it wouldn't be successful. He has 24 league goals and 8 assists in this league season. That covers more than half our goals. It's easy to imagine something filling that gap in his absence, but that's the bigger leap than thinking we'd be in the shit. The next 6 highest scorers get to 24 goals, and most of those have 2 each. So we'd be looking for a lot for an current player or players to fill the gap. And you've seen how we spend money on new players...I don't think anyone would be confident in that working out well.

He'll have to be replaced at some point. But the idea we'd be in a similar position, and not miles worse off, without our most consistently high performing player for many years now is nonsense. Especially this horrible season.
Don’t disagree with you to be honest but I think what your last line says is what is clouding all our thinking.
 

cliff jones

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
4,125
6,717
His goals and to a much smaller extent (due to many opponents stifling our only attacking ploy) his link up play has indeed carried us this season, and it might not be far off to say it largely has since Jose.

Under peak Poch however he was an amazing, more energetic part of a multi-pronged attacking machine.

We would easily be bottom half now had he suffered a Bents-type injury.
 

allatsea

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
8,970
16,235
Sorry, no offense, but I think you’re out of your mind. He’s scored goals for us, lots of them, but he’s not single handedly carried the club.
You are plainly wrong. Without him he would most likely be in a relegation dog fight.
 
Top