- Jun 4, 2005
- 28,471
- 168,307
What do you think?
Woohoo! Thanks Rob.
What do you think?
Why would you want to post/mention an article from that fuckdumpling shitfest of a site anyway? So many people dislike the DM on here but are happy to post lots of articles/links.If it's an article from the Daily Mail, can we copy the whole article and just leave the last word out so we're not copying and pasting the whole article but showing enough of the article to save people from having to click on that fuckdumpling shitfest of a site?
Why would you want to post/mention an article from that fuckdumpling shitfest of a site anyway? So many people dislike the DM on here but are happy to post lots of articles/links.
Just ignore anything they do.
Publishing duplicate content will also have a negative impact on your SEO, so that's an added bonus too.
I have to say that I've been a member of SC since 2003 and I wasn't aware of this. You live and learn.......you should only be posting at most snippets of an article and linking to the original source.
Don't worry mate; there's still free porn.This is nothing short of a disaster for my way of life. I might well have to give up the Internet.
As I said ages ago, plagiarism on here was the norm and I tried to advise members but no on listened.
Or are football sites particularly targeted by the lawyers?
This.
Getty have people trawling football forums and getting trigger happy with their lawyers. As far as I'm aware, we're by far the largest Spurs forum, the only large one with a "news" section and the only one where our forums aren't completely members only.
Fair enough, will know only to post links in futureIt is but it doesn't guarantee anything and in general I dislike the idea of not even being able to read without being a member. Having content open is important for growth and bringing in new users.