- Apr 1, 2005
- 41,363
- 74,893
IMO LoCelso and Ceballos is a bit of overkill and between the 2 of them I'd rather get LoCelso. If we keep Eriksen and don't get Ceballos I'm cool with that.
As long as eriksen signs a new contract.
IMO LoCelso and Ceballos is a bit of overkill and between the 2 of them I'd rather get LoCelso. If we keep Eriksen and don't get Ceballos I'm cool with that.
As long as eriksen signs a new contract.
Would be ideal but RM know he wants to go there and they can have him for free in 12 months. He did say he'd sign a new contract if he didn't get his move so we'll just have to hope he's as good as his word and that the fans don't turn on him.
But do we really see Lo Celso coming in if Eriksen stays?
It isn't if you spread that over two summers though. We didn't spend a thing last transfer window, and surely we didn't only have 35m to spend in each? We were after de Jong so there was 70m or so available last window too. It all adds up
But do we really see Lo Celso coming in if Eriksen stays?
maybe he is interested in joining us temporarily instead of permanently? it seems that he sees his future in madridIf he's not interested in joining us we'd have stopped trying to sign him/lost interest ourselves ages ago.
Pretty sure he also said he would sit down and try to negotiate a new dealHe actually said "staying at spurs would not be a negative". Didn't say he'd sign a new contract. He might have just meant he'd see it out.
Hopefully he does sign. Although i really doubt it. He'd get a huge signing on fee and wage next summer.
Pretty sure he also said he would sit down and try to negotiate a new deal
I don't want Eriksen to go but if he's not signing a new contract we have to cash in.At this point I just want Eriksen to go and us get a quality replacement like Ceballos. I just don't see how Eriksen rediscovers his form if the move fails this summer.
Added quote aboveDidn't hear that interview.
But do we really see Lo Celso coming in if Eriksen stays?
Isn’t it as simple as the permanent deal is signed after the management contract expires?I still don't understand the thinking behind this. If he goes on loan with an option to buy then surely the agent would still get a percentage as they've arranged the deal? If it's a loan without the option to buy then he's risking his next move just because he wants to change agents.
IMO LoCelso and Ceballos is a bit of overkill and between the 2 of them I'd rather get LoCelso. If we keep Eriksen and don't get Ceballos I'm cool with that.
I don't want Eriksen to go but if he's not signing a new contract we have to cash in.
You only have to look at the mess Arsenal are in financially due to losing key assets for nothing.
Eriksen will be a pro and knuckle down if he stays and he's hardly been negative about the club to him a step up is RM not UTD a compliment in itself.Pretty sure he also said he would sit down and try to negotiate a new deal
Edit here is the quote
"It all depends on Daniel Levy and there has to be another club too. Or I will sit down myself at the table and negotiate a new contract. You can’t set a date yourself. There aren’t many boxes that Tottenham don’t tick so if I have to move away, it would have to be a step up."
Eriksen will be a pro and knuckle down if he stays and he's hardly been negative about the club to him a step up is RM not UTD a compliment in itself.
This is exactly the point though isn't it? One is to add, the other to replace.
No way do we end up with all three IMO