What's new

Player Watch Player Watch: Dejan Kulusevski

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2003
9,291
11,342
This lad is going to be a superstar. I can’t believe Juve let him go, has FP got some dirt on them?!??‍♂️?
 

chrisd2k

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2004
3,707
7,156
Shame about the 1v1 buy again makes good decisions, keeps the ball, andooks dangerous
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,698
104,985
Glad we got him instead of Diaz. I watched Diaz for the first time tonight against arsenal and sure he’s a different player but I don’t think he’d have the same impact for us that kulusevski has had for us. He’s been great so far.
 

synththfc

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2017
3,740
26,716
Glad we got him instead of Diaz. I watched Diaz for the first time tonight against arsenal and sure he’s a different player but I don’t think he’d have the same impact for us that kulusevski has had for us. He’s been great so far.
Not saying Diaz isn't intelligent, but Kulusevski is an incredibly cerebral player. We have enough runners in the team, now we finally have someone who thinks before he acts, and our team is better for it.
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,698
104,985
Not saying Diaz isn't intelligent, but Kulusevski is an incredibly cerebral player. We have enough runners in the team, now we finally have someone who thinks before he acts, and our team is better for it.

And to think people were desperate for traore too who is the complete opposite to that.
 

GMI

G.
Dec 13, 2006
3,119
12,216
Not saying Diaz isn't intelligent, but Kulusevski is an incredibly cerebral player. We have enough runners in the team, now we finally have someone who thinks before he acts, and our team is better for it.
Been a while since I’ve seen someone use the word cerebral round these parts . It’s been a good evening. :)
 

greavesy461

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
512
1,615
Glad we got him instead of Diaz. I watched Diaz for the first time tonight against arsenal and sure he’s a different player but I don’t think he’d have the same impact for us that kulusevski has had for us. He’s been great so far.
I agree Kulusevski is what we need right now but Diaz would have been great competition for an off-form Son. If we want to really compete we need to build up the kind of proper depth that Liverpool has. Dybala please. Even if that means Kulusevski dropping to the bench and rotating. It’s what the best teams do. Small ask :)
 

curlacious

Don’t look at me. I’m irrelevant.
Aug 29, 2017
2,129
10,105
CEREBRAL

Yes, I think Diaz is more of a Son rotation option - this guy is different entirely.
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,698
104,985
I agree Kulusevski is what we need right now but Diaz would have been great competition for an off-form Son. If we want to really compete we need to build up the kind of proper depth that Liverpool has. Dybala please. Even if that means Kulusevski dropping to the bench and rotating. It’s what the best teams do. Small ask :)

Liverpool only have that depth now. Up until this season they had shaquiri as a back up attacker.
 

Donki

Has a "Massive Member" Member
May 14, 2007
14,459
18,977
Glad we got him instead of Diaz. I watched Diaz for the first time tonight against arsenal and sure he’s a different player but I don’t think he’d have the same impact for us that kulusevski has had for us. He’s been great so far.
Please explain your thinking here? I don’t mind him but as a creator Diaz is simply head and shoulders above him.
 

Mr Pink

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2010
55,368
100,859
Please explain your thinking here? I don’t mind him but as a creator Diaz is simply head and shoulders above him.

Kulu hasn't stopped creating since he arrived...

Head and shoulders above him?

What you watching big lad lol
 
Top