What's new

Ex-Manager watch: Antonio Conte

rossdapep

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2011
22,405
80,690
I don't know if it was mentioned before but I had seen some concerns about Conte's buys at Chelsea.

I couldn't remember why exactly Conte fell out with the squad/board at Chelsea, So I did some snooping.

In his last summer Chelsea spent huge sums on Morata, Drinkwater and Bakayoko plus Barkley in January, these players massively flopped at Chelsea which gave the impression Conte wasted loads of money. However, I discovered that none of these were in fact players he wanted.

He wanted Kane, not Morata, but I also seem to recall he wanted Lukaku but United were willing to pay the fee and Chelsea weren't.

It all seemed to start when he decided Diego Costa needed to be sold. Again, this wasn't actually his fault and was because Costa had been saying he wanted to go chase money in China or go back to Atletico, all in the midst of a title race. As soon as Chelsea won the title, Conte wanted to move on and text Costa telling him he was done at Chelsea and would be moved on.

Unfortunately, the Chelsea board did not see it the same and wanted Costa to stay. Costa didn't appreciate the text, even though her been asking for it, neither did Willian and players close to Costa. Despite Conte doing the right thing for the team.

I think this is when the Chelsea board started going against Conte's calls and started buying players against his wishes. I seem to recall him complaining about it a lot.

Hopefully Conte has learnt from that and will just allow Paratici to do the axing should he want players out.

But it certainly shows that Conte won't accept uncommitted players and that Chelsea's board were more in the wrong in this instance rather than Conte kicking off for no reason and wasting money.
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,996
71,428
I don't know if it was mentioned before but I had seen some concerns about Conte's buys at Chelsea.

I couldn't remember why exactly Conte fell out with the squad/board at Chelsea, So I did some snooping.

In his last summer Chelsea spent huge sums on Morata, Drinkwater and Bakayoko plus Barkley in January, these players massively flopped at Chelsea which gave the impression Conte wasted loads of money. However, I discovered that none of these were in fact players he wanted.

He wanted Kane, not Morata, but I also seem to recall he wanted Lukaku but United were willing to pay the fee and Chelsea weren't.

It all seemed to start when he decided Diego Costa needed to be sold. Again, this wasn't actually his fault and was because Costa had been saying he wanted to go chase money in China or go back to Atletico, all in the midst of a title race. As soon as Chelsea won the title, Conte wanted to move on and text Costa telling him he was done at Chelsea and would be moved on.

Unfortunately, the Chelsea board did not see it the same and wanted Costa to stay. Costa didn't appreciate the text, even though her been asking for it, neither did Willian and players close to Costa. Despite Conte doing the right thing for the team.

I think this is when the Chelsea board started going against Conte's calls and started buying players against his wishes. I seem to recall him complaining about it a lot.

Hopefully Conte has learnt from that and will just allow Paratici to do the axing should he want players out.

But it certainly shows that Conte won't accept uncommitted players and that Chelsea's board were more in the wrong in this instance rather than Conte kicking off for no reason and wasting money.
That was such a terrible window from Chelsea & they paid for it. It’s incredible to think the amount of money they wasted on that window only to spend more to correct it. I remember Conte getting alot of shit for that but i think his minimal usage of some of them proved his point. I think that was a window of a pissed off, completely disconnected board showing whose boss. And, given the quality of them, it’s not a shock they failed. The structure here should be different with Levy apparently largely leaving it to Paratici. We’ll see.
 

hellava_tough

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2005
9,429
12,383
I don't know if it was mentioned before but I had seen some concerns about Conte's buys at Chelsea.

I couldn't remember why exactly Conte fell out with the squad/board at Chelsea, So I did some snooping.

In his last summer Chelsea spent huge sums on Morata, Drinkwater and Bakayoko plus Barkley in January, these players massively flopped at Chelsea which gave the impression Conte wasted loads of money. However, I discovered that none of these were in fact players he wanted.

He wanted Kane, not Morata, but I also seem to recall he wanted Lukaku but United were willing to pay the fee and Chelsea weren't.

It all seemed to start when he decided Diego Costa needed to be sold. Again, this wasn't actually his fault and was because Costa had been saying he wanted to go chase money in China or go back to Atletico, all in the midst of a title race. As soon as Chelsea won the title, Conte wanted to move on and text Costa telling him he was done at Chelsea and would be moved on.

Unfortunately, the Chelsea board did not see it the same and wanted Costa to stay. Costa didn't appreciate the text, even though her been asking for it, neither did Willian and players close to Costa. Despite Conte doing the right thing for the team.

I think this is when the Chelsea board started going against Conte's calls and started buying players against his wishes. I seem to recall him complaining about it a lot.

Hopefully Conte has learnt from that and will just allow Paratici to do the axing should he want players out.

But it certainly shows that Conte won't accept uncommitted players and that Chelsea's board were more in the wrong in this instance rather than Conte kicking off for no reason and wasting money.

Yeah, the board didn't really support him during this time, especially with the Costa saga.

But Conte wanting Kane? Surely he knew that was never going to happen.
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,701
105,003
He's just a bundle of energy. Interesting that "the marine" was his fitness coach as a player and he was so impressed he wanted him in his team when he became manager.

No excuses left for the players. They can't say they've been allowed to get unfit, they can't say the manager isn't good enough or tactical enough. The only reason we don't get to latter stages of comps is if the players don't execute the plan.

Very confident with the big caveat that Levy needs to just leave it to Antonio and Fabio to deal with the football side and don't start veto-ing transfers or go back on promises.

Unfortunately we know that is going to happen. It’s just a question of when.
 

spids

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2015
6,647
27,841
Hopefully having both a respected DoF and a world class manager who is notorious for causing a stink if he is not backed will stop Levy refusing to go a little bit higher to get a player we want. Im thinking of Grealish (when we wouldn’t go a couple of million higher as we thought they were screwed when he would still have been a massive bargain. Im also thinking of Mane and Winaldjum.
 

Spurslove

Well-Known Member
Jul 6, 2012
6,627
9,281
That was such a terrible window from Chelsea & they paid for it. It’s incredible to think the amount of money they wasted on that window only to spend more to correct it. I remember Conte getting alot of shit for that but i think his minimal usage of some of them proved his point. I think that was a window of a pissed off, completely disconnected board showing whose boss. And, given the quality of them, it’s not a shock they failed. The structure here should be different with Levy apparently largely leaving it to Paratici. We’ll see.

You nailed it there, and with Fabio and Conte working together, all the problems Conte experienced at Chelsea as described above will not re-occur this time. When a club buys players without the Managers approval, they invite utter disaster.

.
 

KaribYid

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2012
1,311
7,857
He's just a bundle of energy. Interesting that "the marine" was his fitness coach as a player and he was so impressed he wanted him in his team when he became manager.

No excuses left for the players. They can't say they've been allowed to get unfit, they can't say the manager isn't good enough or tactical enough. The only reason we don't get to latter stages of comps is if the players don't execute the plan.

Very confident with the big caveat that Levy needs to just leave it to Antonio and Fabio to deal with the football side and don't start veto-ing transfers or go back on promises.

Yup. He really just needs to set the budget and let Fab and Conte get on with it. He needs to refrain from giving his opinions on players and what they're worth or who we already have in the squad. Once a signing is within budget, he needs to give the football management free rein.
 

DarwinSpur

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2020
6,019
10,625
The unbridled sense of optimism and faith on display in this thread simultaneously warms the cockles of my heart and fills me with a sense of existential dread.
 

Guernman

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2013
1,533
7,918
I've said this before, but I can see Levy now leaving player targets and incoming transfers down to Conte and Paratici and giving them a budget to work with.

But where I see this blowing up is when it comes to outgoings. And I think this was the problem with previous managers and the crux of the issue I have with Levy.

It won't take long for Conte to realise, just as Poch and Jose did before him, that some of our players need to be axed for the good of the squad. But if (or when...) he wants to get rid of Dier, or Winks or Dele for example, this is when Levy starts digging in on unrealistic valuations.

It doesn't matter that Dele cost £5 million or whatever it was, Levy will be anchored to the fact that at one point he was considered a potential £100 million talent. Winks and Dier as homegrown and, until recently, key players for England must also be worth a premium price etc, etc.... Of course they can go Antonio, provided a reasonble bid comes in...

Player acquisitions are investments with potential upside, sometimes massive upside, and that's why Levy loves player acquisitions and always has. He has actually never been shy to splash the cash, (Traore aside). But, and this is the big BUT, getting him to sell players for what he deems a loss is like pulling teeth. This is where our transfer policy and squad management has always floundered.

Conte will expect players who don't meet his demanding standards to be out of the picture, no questions asked. This is even more important than who we bring in because his whole ethos demands we get rid of any bad apples. It doesn't matter what the financial cost to the club, every player must be on board or out.

It was the bad apples that undid Poch and Jose. Mourinho may have been past it, but he still knows more about football and players than Levy ever will. You just know that he would have been insisting that the likes of Winks and Alli be moved on at any cost, and you just know that the calculation going on inside Levy's head would have been, if I can get another manager to bring the best out of these players then I will be saving tens of millions.

So yes, Levy has always been willing to back his managers with player purchases, these are investments and that aligns with his DNA. But for him to really back Conte, and the thing we need him to do to prevent Conte blowing up and walking out, is to be prepared to jettison any player Conte demands at whatever the cost to the club or the imaginary loss based upon Levy's dream valuations. Cancel and buy out his contract if need be, but that is what will be required if this is to be a happy marriage.

My great concern is that this goes so completely against the grain for our dear Daniel.
 

spids

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2015
6,647
27,841
I am so disinterested in International football that I had not realised the 2nd England, Denmark, and Northern Ireland games are on Monday and thus Kane, Højbjerg, Doherty will be back with us on Tues for what is pretty much a full week of training. England U21 and France play on Tuesday so Skipp and Lloris will be back Weds. Argentina vs Brazil is also on Tuesday so realistically Romero, Lo Celso and Emerson back in training on Thursday. Son playing Tuesday in Iraq of all places (having recently played in Iran and Syria).

It has worked out well we're playing at 16:30 in Sunday as the players will have a decent few days training at HW with Conte.
 

CanadaSpurs

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2013
1,450
4,367
I am so disinterested in International football that I had not realised the 2nd England, Denmark, and Northern Ireland games are on Monday and thus Kane, Højbjerg, Doherty will be back with us on Tues for what is pretty much a full week of training. England U21 and France play on Tuesday so Skipp and Lloris will be back Weds. Argentina vs Brazil is also on Tuesday so realistically Romero, Lo Celso and Emerson back in training on Thursday. Son playing Tuesday in Iraq of all places (having recently played in Iran and Syria).

It has worked out well we're playing at 16:30 in Sunday as the players will have a decent few days training at HW with Conte.
Is Son playing? I thought he got hurt (again).
 

bat-chain

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2009
2,232
9,478
I am so disinterested in International football that I had not realised the 2nd England, Denmark, and Northern Ireland games are on Monday and thus Kane, Højbjerg, Doherty will be back with us on Tues for what is pretty much a full week of training. England U21 and France play on Tuesday so Skipp and Lloris will be back Weds. Argentina vs Brazil is also on Tuesday so realistically Romero, Lo Celso and Emerson back in training on Thursday. Son playing Tuesday in Iraq of all places (having recently played in Iran and Syria).

It has worked out well we're playing at 16:30 in Sunday as the players will have a decent few days training at HW with Conte.

And he was in Newcastle just a few weeks ago, Son Heung-min vs the axis of evil.
 

Spurslove

Well-Known Member
Jul 6, 2012
6,627
9,281
I've said this before, but I can see Levy now leaving player targets and incoming transfers down to Conte and Paratici and giving them a budget to work with.

But where I see this blowing up is when it comes to outgoings. And I think this was the problem with previous managers and the crux of the issue I have with Levy.

It won't take long for Conte to realise, just as Poch and Jose did before him, that some of our players need to be axed for the good of the squad. But if (or when...) he wants to get rid of Dier, or Winks or Dele for example, this is when Levy starts digging in on unrealistic valuations.

It doesn't matter that Dele cost £5 million or whatever it was, Levy will be anchored to the fact that at one point he was considered a potential £100 million talent. Winks and Dier as homegrown and, until recently, key players for England must also be worth a premium price etc, etc.... Of course they can go Antonio, provided a reasonble bid comes in...

Player acquisitions are investments with potential upside, sometimes massive upside, and that's why Levy loves player acquisitions and always has. He has actually never been shy to splash the cash, (Traore aside). But, and this is the big BUT, getting him to sell players for what he deems a loss is like pulling teeth. This is where our transfer policy and squad management has always floundered.

Conte will expect players who don't meet his demanding standards to be out of the picture, no questions asked. This is even more important than who we bring in because his whole ethos demands we get rid of any bad apples. It doesn't matter what the financial cost to the club, every player must be on board or out.

It was the bad apples that undid Poch and Jose. Mourinho may have been past it, but he still knows more about football and players than Levy ever will. You just know that he would have been insisting that the likes of Winks and Alli be moved on at any cost, and you just know that the calculation going on inside Levy's head would have been, if I can get another manager to bring the best out of these players then I will be saving tens of millions.

So yes, Levy has always been willing to back his managers with player purchases, these are investments and that aligns with his DNA. But for him to really back Conte, and the thing we need him to do to prevent Conte blowing up and walking out, is to be prepared to jettison any player Conte demands at whatever the cost to the club or the imaginary loss based upon Levy's dream valuations. Cancel and buy out his contract if need be, but that is what will be required if this is to be a happy marriage.

My great concern is that this goes so completely against the grain for our dear Daniel.

That's all fine and good, except none of it may be true. We know how the club has been run these past 20 years but let's be honest, we've never had a DoF like Fabio and I don't think Levy has ever effectively relinquished his responsibility to buy players off his own bat. Yes, he may well have set Fabio a budget, but the idea behind bringing him in in the first place place was so that he (Levy) could step away from the footballing side of the business and leave that to someone who actually knows something about football.

We've already seen the immediate financial effects of that change in the clubs' structure, with the Anthony Joshua fight, an upcoming Ariana Grande concert and some NFL games coming our way too.

I'm not expecting a massive window this January, but come summer I think we're going to go a bit bonkers. We need to be seriously challenging once again for the title and we're nowhere near it with this current squad.

I also feel preliminary discussions have already been taking place between Fabio and Conte regarding who he wants to come in and who needs to be upgraded. If we can grab a top 6 place by May, that might just about be acceptable but next season, I'm expecting and hoping we'll be kicking on.

Of course, none of that might be true either. :)

.
 

Archibald-CPH

Well-Known Member
Mar 15, 2005
961
1,006
That's all fine and good, except none of it may be true. We know how the club has been run these past 20 years but let's be honest, we've never had a DoF like Fabio and I don't think Levy has ever effectively relinquished his responsibility to buy players off his own bat. Yes, he may well have set Fabio a budget, but the idea behind bringing him in in the first place place was so that he (Levy) could step away from the footballing side of the business and leave that to someone who actually knows something about football.

We've already seen the immediate financial effects of that change in the clubs' structure, with the Anthony Joshua fight, an upcoming Ariana Grande concert and some NFL games coming our way too.

I'm not expecting a massive window this January, but come summer I think we're going to go a bit bonkers. We need to be seriously challenging once again for the title and we're nowhere near it with this current squad.

I also feel preliminary discussions have already been taking place between Fabio and Conte regarding who he wants to come in and who needs to be upgraded. If we can grab a top 6 place by May, that might just about be acceptable but next season, I'm expecting and hoping we'll be kicking on.

Of course, none of that might be true either. :)

.
Comolli and Arnesen springs to mind.. they are defintely up there
 

Johno1470

The worst thing about prison was the dementors
Aug 6, 2018
1,030
4,865

It won't take long for Conte to realise, just as Poch and Jose did before him, that some of our players need to be axed for the good of the squad. But if (or when...) he wants to get rid of Dier, or Winks or Dele for example, this is when Levy starts digging in on unrealistic valuations
This was a genuine concern for me prior to the summer transfer window but we sold the following or let them go for free.
Gazzaniga - contract expired
Rose - contract expired
Aurier - contract terminated
Sissoko - sold for £3million (Source - BBC)
Toby - sold (transfer fee varies from different sources £3-£13million.

Lamela - he was sold to Sevilla in an exchange plus £21.6mill for Bryan Gil. Depending on what you value Gil, Lamela essentially went for peanuts.

It was evident in the summer we were willing to cut our losses and not just renew a players contract for the sake of it. We did a great job in the summer to start clearing the deadwood. All of the above plus trying to sell the likes of Winks, Alli and Moura in a market where money was tight would have been pretty unrealistic.
 

Spurslove

Well-Known Member
Jul 6, 2012
6,627
9,281
Comolli and Arnesen springs to mind.. they are defintely up there

Not sure either man was given the reins anything like what Fabio has, and as our friend said, Arnesen wasn't here 5 minutes before Chelsea tapped him up (and that incidentally, so I've heard, is the real reason why to this day, Levy refuses to do any business with them and good on him for that).

.
 
Top