- Jan 25, 2004
- 4,569
- 2,202
My ethos: sell anyone for the right price and if we can get an upgrade.
This would mean pretty much the entire squad bar the front-line; but there are obvious candidates for upgrading: Rose, RB, CMs; I think there is enough out there to secure replacements relatively easily.
I will challenge conventional wisdom here and say of the 'popular players to let go' Eriksen is the one we should try to retain (yes, despite the lack of commitment this season). Now hear me out (try to ignore the ill-will harboured from this season and 2H last season..)
1) His ability is not questionable. Unlike Rose/Vert etc; he isn't a player in decline. He is proven in PL.
2) Playmakers don't transition well to PL from different leagues; there are many high profile failures (Jorgino included, until this season. Veron for example; probably the most talented high profile failure from the last 10 seasons). Reason is obvious: you need the right physical qualities and adoptability for this league and it's not easy to be strong, fast and technical same time. The ones who have go on to bigger things (e.g. Modric).
3) He will cost a bucket load to replace.
4) He is unlikely to be a good CM (which we are asking him to be because the rest of what we got can't do the job); is this his fault or ours?
I think you get my point if you've read it this far. He is difficult to replace and has proven he could do a job.
There are other considerations of course: influence on other players etc; but i don't think there are reports that he has been a toxic influence. He is certainly more PC and considered than Rose.
This is why I think if we get the other pieces in, we can see a new and better Eriksen (should we convince him to stay).
This would mean pretty much the entire squad bar the front-line; but there are obvious candidates for upgrading: Rose, RB, CMs; I think there is enough out there to secure replacements relatively easily.
I will challenge conventional wisdom here and say of the 'popular players to let go' Eriksen is the one we should try to retain (yes, despite the lack of commitment this season). Now hear me out (try to ignore the ill-will harboured from this season and 2H last season..)
1) His ability is not questionable. Unlike Rose/Vert etc; he isn't a player in decline. He is proven in PL.
2) Playmakers don't transition well to PL from different leagues; there are many high profile failures (Jorgino included, until this season. Veron for example; probably the most talented high profile failure from the last 10 seasons). Reason is obvious: you need the right physical qualities and adoptability for this league and it's not easy to be strong, fast and technical same time. The ones who have go on to bigger things (e.g. Modric).
3) He will cost a bucket load to replace.
4) He is unlikely to be a good CM (which we are asking him to be because the rest of what we got can't do the job); is this his fault or ours?
I think you get my point if you've read it this far. He is difficult to replace and has proven he could do a job.
There are other considerations of course: influence on other players etc; but i don't think there are reports that he has been a toxic influence. He is certainly more PC and considered than Rose.
This is why I think if we get the other pieces in, we can see a new and better Eriksen (should we convince him to stay).