What's new

Which is fairer? Coronavirus implications

Everlasting Seconds

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2014
14,914
26,616
I believe the PFAs across Europe will push the club's into extending contracts until the final game for each club. Players get their contracts extended, clubs keep their players a bit more.
In legal terms, it would be an extension for a specified period and at worst this situation would be considered force majeure and would allow such a deviation in terms.

The only difficulty is reconciling the domestic cups and European cup matches. Not sure how that could be done other than to cancel the domestic cup competitions to make room in the scheduling and give the qualification slot to the league position
Surely this must be on a voluntary basis between each club and each player? I doubt, although happy to be proven wrong, that each contract has a clause for unilateral (forced) extension in case shit hits the fan.
 

Locotoro

Prince of Zamunda
Sep 2, 2004
9,398
14,079
Surely this must be on a voluntary basis between each club and each player? I doubt, although happy to be proven wrong, that each contract has a clause for unilateral (forced) extension in case shit hits the fan.
Absolutely, this entire approach would have to be bilateral. If we're considering everyone will be in the same boat I don't believe there will be many players who would want to break the trend and if they do I imagine we won't hear about it (it will be more a case of player x is injured until such time and has been released early)
 

thebenjamin

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2008
12,267
38,961
Realistically next season isn't looking too clever either. No chance this pandemic is all wrapped up in 5 months time.
 

TonyS

Well-Known Member
Feb 28, 2005
540
1,081
No matter what happens next with the season, cancel, postpone etc, some teams will be pissed off. There will be a legal action the like they have never seen before.
 

Freddie

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2004
2,076
4,308
No matter what happens next with the season, cancel, postpone etc, some teams will be pissed off. There will be a legal action the like they have never seen before.

Will be interesting to see what happens re legal action and claiming lost income through insurers. Considering the amounts that clubs will claim to have missed out on it could instantly bankrupt football authorities and insurance companies. The sums at the top end of football are simply too big
 

AmericanSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2010
239
335
Assuming the season can’t be continued and everything pushed back, Option A. You can’t base league standings on an uneven schedule. It benefits Spurs and those in the relegation zone more than other teams and Leiceister and the teams in the Championship who would be promoted get screwed. But ultimately making decisions based purely off what has happened thus far also is unfair.
 

whitesocks

The past means nothing. This is a message for life
Jan 16, 2014
4,652
5,738
No matter what happens next with the season, cancel, postpone etc, some teams will be pissed off. There will be a legal action the like they have never seen before.
No - I think all teams accept that nothing is won or lost until the very end of the season.
However TV companies might want a big refund as most of the big audiences tune in for the final weeks of the competitions. Tricky as their money is already spent on wages.
 

elfy

Well-Known Member
Jan 1, 2013
1,557
6,846
The problem is looking at the league table, the top four - fine, you could reasonably give the title and champions league spots to the teams there. What about the Europa league spots? If we give the league spots to Man U who are in fifth and Wolves in sixth (giving the final cup spot to a random FA cup participant) this is hugely unfair on Sheffield United who have played 1 game less than Man U and Wolves. If the last cup spot is given to Sheffield utd, then its unfair to Arsenal as Arsenal have played a game less than Wolves. At the other end of the table, do we relegate Aston Villa even though they have played a game less than the teams above them. If they aren't relegated who is relegated instead and on what basis?

There is no fair way to finish the season now, the only option, although not ideal is to consider the season abandoned and restart the season from scratch using last seasons standings for european spots/relegation etc
 

Johnny J

Not the Kiwi you need but the one you deserve
Aug 18, 2012
18,534
48,899
No matter what happens next with the season, cancel, postpone etc, some teams will be pissed off. There will be a legal action the like they have never seen before.
I disagree. As a lawyer, I would be slow to advise a club to be seen to be seeking damages on the back of a global pandemic that will have killed thousands. Terrible for reputation.

There'll be a gentleman's agreement between the clubs to not do this.
 

Trotter

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2009
2,169
3,312
No matter what happens next with the season, cancel, postpone etc, some teams will be pissed off. There will be a legal action the like they have never seen before.


Who do you think they could sue, and for what exactly ?

Loss of matchday earnings for something along these lines is something the clubs could insure against if they choose to
Sue the Premier League, well each club is one of the 20 equal shareholders of the League, so sue themselves ?
The one thing the clubs cannot afford to give up is the money received from TV, that is why they will have to finish this season to honour that contract,even if this one ends in September and then cram the next in November to June next year, and adjust match calendar so teams can opt out of the cups for example.
 
Last edited:

hellava_tough

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2005
9,429
12,383
The problem is looking at the league table, the top four - fine, you could reasonably give the title and champions league spots to the teams there. What about the Europa league spots? If we give the league spots to Man U who are in fifth and Wolves in sixth (giving the final cup spot to a random FA cup participant) this is hugely unfair on Sheffield United who have played 1 game less than Man U and Wolves. If the last cup spot is given to Sheffield utd, then its unfair to Arsenal as Arsenal have played a game less than Wolves. At the other end of the table, do we relegate Aston Villa even though they have played a game less than the teams above them. If they aren't relegated who is relegated instead and on what basis?

There is no fair way to finish the season now, the only option, although not ideal is to consider the season abandoned and restart the season from scratch using last seasons standings for european spots/relegation etc

I don't think you could

Firstly we don't know if Man City are in it

Secondly, wolves and Sheffield United have a decent chance at getting a CL spot, and to a lesser extent Arsenal (and I guess us if you don't take injuries into account)
 

ralvy

AVB my love
Jun 26, 2012
2,511
4,626
So, you guys still think this COVID-19 pandemic is just a coincidence? I think Daniel Levy may have triggered a secret clause in our agreement with AIA in case of a failed season.
 

jay2040

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
2,674
4,261
No - I think all teams accept that nothing is won or lost until the very end of the season.
However TV companies might want a big refund as most of the big audiences tune in for the final weeks of the competitions. Tricky as their money is already spent on wages.

Do you think we will get a refund on sports subscription services!
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,682
104,959
No - I think all teams accept that nothing is won or lost until the very end of the season.
However TV companies might want a big refund as most of the big audiences tune in for the final weeks of the competitions. Tricky as their money is already spent on wages.

Suggesting that here

 

eddiebailey

Well-Known Member
Oct 12, 2004
7,454
6,717
Of course a precedent for suspending the League was set in 1915. When football resumed in 1919 promotion and relegation issues were settled in a way that resulted in no lasting grievances. None whatsoever. The ****s.
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,682
104,959
Of course a precedent for suspending the League was set in 1915. When football resumed in 1919 promotion and relegation issues were settled in a way that resulted in no lasting grievances. None whatsoever. The ****s.

They’ll do something similar this time guaranteed.
 
Top