What's new

VOTE FOR CAULKER!!! U21 Player of the Year!

whitelightwhiteheat

SC Supporter
Jul 21, 2006
6,517
3,195
I think over the last 12 months Glen Johnson has made himself more versatile.

He is now shit at both right back AND left back.

This nomination is recognition for this, perhaps?
 

whitelightwhiteheat

SC Supporter
Jul 21, 2006
6,517
3,195
Look at the rest of the list too.

Gerrard is shit these days.

Ashley Cole's gone back a mile over the last 12 months.

Welbeck? He's ok, but massively over-rated, mostly.

Joe Hart has also shown he is actually human after all this year too - after being pretty flawless since making his breakthrough.

So yeah... what does that say? Nothing we didn't already know, I guess. England are shit.

But all of this is to miss the point, which is: VOTE FOR CAULKER!
 

lillywhites61

SC Supporter
Aug 11, 2009
3,538
2,270
Lol, I voted for caulker, I voted for the women's one, but then read the senior men's and wanted to vomit!!! I didn't vote at all! There have been others tht have actually played for the shirt for once with England! Without being to bias, Parker anyone!
 

beats1

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2010
30,006
29,551
Thing is, in a England shirt Johnson has been the best of that lot, I think he has improved or everyone else has got alot worse but he is not the weak link in that defence. Even the "great John Terry" couldnt play players offside,

I never seen so many players just run through on goal against england because the CB's cant keep the line straight than I have seen in the past 6 months under Roy and even more shocking that is for a team that pretty much sits deep for 90 mins
 

Yid121

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
3,463
3,139
Gerrard for seniors, he's been good had taken a few of our qualifiers by the scruff of the neck. Voted Caulker for U21s too.
 

nightgoat

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2005
24,604
21,898
Thing is, in a England shirt Johnson has been the best of that lot, I think he has improved or everyone else has got alot worse but he is not the weak link in that defence. Even the "great John Terry" couldnt play players offside,

I never seen so many players just run through on goal against england because the CB's cant keep the line straight than I have seen in the past 6 months under Roy and even more shocking that is for a team that pretty much sits deep for 90 mins

Johnson was directly responsible for about three goals conceded in the Euros, though.
 

Reece

Shutterbug
May 27, 2005
2,860
1,779
Voted Gerrard, Caulker & the bird who scored loads of goals for Team GB at the Olympics.
 

edson

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2005
3,945
12,117
Why is it that whatever RM you put in front of Johnson always ends up playing RB because the lazy F***er will not come back, Johnson has never been a RB.
 

brasil_spur

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2006
12,670
16,715
Look at the rest of the list too.

Gerrard is shit these days.

Ashley Cole's gone back a mile over the last 12 months.

Welbeck? He's ok, but massively over-rated, mostly.

Joe Hart has also shown he is actually human after all this year too - after being pretty flawless since making his breakthrough.

So yeah... what does that say? Nothing we didn't already know, I guess. England are shit.

But all of this is to miss the point, which is: VOTE FOR CAULKER!

Welbeck - 4th choice striker at Man Utd.... :rolleyes: - unbelievable!
 

hughy

I'm SUPER cereal.
Nov 18, 2007
31,842
56,935
Caulker and Hart. Because Hart is the one I detest the least.
 

Misfit

President of The Niles Crane Fanclub
May 7, 2006
21,016
34,214
Hahaha. Back to the Graham Taylor days of quality in terms of players. We're such a shithouse footballing nation. With our population and resources. Shameful.

Gazza and Scholes the last remnants of real quality in the last 20 yrs. Waddle obviously but not sure he played for Ingerlund after '92.
 
Top