- Jan 7, 2009
No it's just the same bollocks going round and round.
You should applaud both his knowledge and implementation of Rule 117 Subsection B.I'm not sure how I should react to this.
I told a fellow Spurs fan who's very much Poch in that one of the reasons why fans are so concerned and have started to have questions about the manager's future is
our poor form over the the 2019 calendar year, not just the start of this season.
He rebutted by saying I should not be harping on the calendar year results and that run to the CL final affected our form for the 2nd half of last season. He went to say to be fair, focus on this season alone and that to include last season's form is baggage and should not be taken into account.
Tell me how I should react to this fan, lads.
Kane didn't play vs Everton either. So even if he doesn't miss many, he wouldn't have taken that one.the fact that even if we didn't score the penalties, no 1 knows what would have happened for the rest of the match, plus Kane doesn't miss many
considering the quote I originally posted included 2 or 3 other penalties when Kane was on the field, then what is your point?Kane didn't play vs Everton either. So even if he doesn't miss many, he wouldn't have taken that one.
Your straws are diminishing
It's just a shame that Poch didn't turn up along with Harry Kane 5 years later, with the stadium and infrastructure in place and then I think we would have seen Levy (or new owners) put proper investment into the team just as Liverpool were able to do once they say Klopp was so close to glory.