What's new

The Daily ITK 'who will get banned first' Discussion Thread - 10th June 2012

Status
Not open for further replies.

Norvern Munkey

Delusions of Adequacy
Jan 4, 2011
673
2,705
There would be nda and confidentiality agreements for anything like this if it was true, anyone breaching something like that can pretty much forget about working in law again

It is so far fetched it is ridiculous

No ... its so far fetched it can only be classed as pre-transfer window ITK..... Think this one is a "Ooooh nice try but still a strike and a miss! Never mind join the back of the queue and have another go"
 

Gbspurs

Gatekeeper for debates, King of the plonkers
Jan 27, 2011
26,945
61,824
TBF the supposed person who got the ITK was sent it by mistake an therefore probably wouldn't be bound by the same confidentiality agreement if doesn't work on the case. Maybe. Still horseshit though!
 

Norvern Munkey

Delusions of Adequacy
Jan 4, 2011
673
2,705
TBF the supposed person who got the ITK was sent it by mistake an therefore probably wouldn't be bound by the same confidentiality agreement if doesn't work on the case. Maybe. Still horseshit though!

I agree regarding equestrian excrement... but in the real world surely you would send an email back to your collegue saying "oh oh.... careful with that one mate...it is potentially a hot potato "........ or is it just me who wouldnt take advantage of a faux pas?
 

duffster

Active Member
Dec 11, 2004
446
226
TBF the supposed person who got the ITK was sent it by mistake an therefore probably wouldn't be bound by the same confidentiality agreement if doesn't work on the case. Maybe. Still horseshit though!

Even if that solicitor wasn't working on the case but was employed by the firm that was, I think he would still be bound by client confidentiality.
 

bilburger

eater, sleeper, excreter
Jul 26, 2010
298
392
I for one have dismissed this new 'ITK' as utter bollocks. Thanks for sharing it and all, but let's never speak of it again.
 

RJ1882

SC Supporter
Aug 28, 2010
2,122
1,843
Client confidentially yes. But hypothetically speaking, if my mate worked in such a solicitors office that was dealing with such a matter, regardless of how high profile, if it related to Spurs in this way, I'm sure he'd tell me. Might tell me to say nothing to anyone else of course, but he'd tell me. As I'm sure all your mates would tell you.
So much hype that he'll go, its hard to see how he can stay now. Surely he realises 50% of fans want him gone, and with questionable backing from the board. Mutual agreement would be best.
 

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,333
77,592
He has said in an interview today that he will not be leaving Ajax this summer even if there is increased interest after the Euros.
He then went on to say Vertonghen will be a great signing for us, and then he was asked 'Might you join him at Tottenham in the future?' He replied 'Maybe'.

So hopefullly weve got him on our radar.
The question is, will Ajax want to deal with Daniel Levy again? :)

Maybe if we start negotiations for Eriksen now we could have him ready for next season.
 

Star_of_Davids

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2005
490
281
Even if that solicitor wasn't working on the case but was employed by the firm that was, I think he would still be bound by client confidentiality.
Definitely. Any professional is bound by client confidentiality by any information that they discover through their employment. I am an accountant and come across plenty of information related to clients of the practice but not 'my' cases through bouncing ideas off colleagues, overhearing stuff etc but through professional ethics, and a wish to keep my job and remain in the profession, would not divulge anything
 

Spurs_Bear

Well-Known Member
Jan 7, 2009
17,094
22,286
Client confidentially yes. But hypothetically speaking, if my mate worked in such a solicitors office that was dealing with such a matter, regardless of how high profile, if it related to Spurs in this way, I'm sure he'd Kell me. Might tell me to say nothing to anyone else of course, but he'd tell me. As I'm sure all your mates would tell you.
So much hype that he'll go, its hard to see how he can stay now. Surely he realises 50% of fans want him gone, and hetics questionable backing from the board. Mutual agreement would be best.

No, 50% of SC might want him gone, it's different in the real world. It's probably more like 10%.
 

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,333
77,592
Not sure if this has been posted yet but here it goes.

From a guy called Crab on GG:

I have some genuine itk! redknapp's is definitely leaving
I was at the christening of a friends son today, and one of our mutual friends, who is a lawyer and whose wife is also a lawyer told me that one of her colleagues ad told that spurs had asked us to act on their behalf in drawing up an agreement for us and redknapp to terminate his contract with mutual consent! Basically there are two people within the firm who have got the same name, one who is dealing with this case, and the other guy who is a friend of hers, anyway apparently all the details were sent to the wrong guy (her friend) initially by mistake, which is how she came to know about it. Make of that what you will, my friend seemed to think it was genuine!
That reminds me of the time they sent me the contract for Zidane by mistake. I thought his name sounded stupid so I tore it up. Thus he never joined Spurs. My bad.
 

talkshowhost86

Mod-Moose
Staff
Oct 2, 2004
48,100
47,055
TBF the supposed person who got the ITK was sent it by mistake an therefore probably wouldn't be bound by the same confidentiality agreement if doesn't work on the case. Maybe. Still horseshit though!

You would be bound by client confidentiality because he's still a client of your firm. This whole thing smells like nonsense. Can anyone find two employees at Olswang with the same name?
 

hybridsoldier

Well-Known Member
Aug 2, 2004
5,892
1,185
I think there are a lot of people who are bored and mischief making really. Harry's stance last night on BBC was quite a straight bat really, this guy is such a bad liar though that for me it genuinely seems like no decision has been reached and we are at an impasse, probably more talks this week.

Agreed that in the real world I reckon its a minority that wouldn't mind Redknapp leaving. I would be happy if a really top coach came in who could win over the squad quite quickly. Otherwise I am happy with Redknapp for now but don't see us progressing under him (then again sticking around in the top 6 isn't exactly bad!). The way it has gone since Feb though I really do feel parting ways is the best thing that can happen. The unrest will roll over into the playing season otherwise
 

piedpiper

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2008
3,758
6,763
having briefly visited the GG pages ages ago, i know that they loved to mock the ITK thread. so they may have been having some fun on how ridiculous the ITK can be. they would often take ITK info off here and completely ridicule said itk. so the latest itk may just have been that.
 

RJ1882

SC Supporter
Aug 28, 2010
2,122
1,843
No, 50% of SC might want him gone, it's different in the real world. It's probably more like 10%.

Really? Is it that few? I can't speak for those that probably have the louder voice, those at WHL every game. But going by Twitter, here and spurs Odyssey, I'd say its evenly split .

Could be wrong though. Us clowns wasting our lives away on forums probably don't reflect those with real lives.
 

Spurs_Bear

Well-Known Member
Jan 7, 2009
17,094
22,286
Really? Is it that few? I can't speak for those that probably have the louder voice, those at WHL every game. But going by Twitter, here and spurs Odyssey, I'd say its evenly split .

Could be wrong though. Us clowns wasting our lives away on forums probably don't reflect those with real lives.

Probably depends where you sit I guess, but there's no way more than 10% of the people that sit near me want him 'gone' and those that do are the same ones that have been calling him a 'pikey ****' since the day he took over.

It's like everything though isn't it, if you have a good relationship with your missus you don't spend all the time when you are with your mates telling them how great she is (unless she's a new one they haven't met and you want to tell them she takes it up the Gary....). The unhappier people always shout loudest.
 

hoodlum

eye have won eye, plus too others
Apr 4, 2011
2,844
1,614
That reminds me of the time they sent me the contract for Zidane by mistake. I thought his name sounded stupid so I tore it up. Thus he never joined Spurs. My bad.
Has he played in the PL? Perhaps at Portsmouth? No? Never heard of him. Pass.
 

Gbspurs

Gatekeeper for debates, King of the plonkers
Jan 27, 2011
26,945
61,824
You would be bound by client confidentiality because he's still a client of your firm. This whole thing smells like nonsense. Can anyone find two employees at Olswang with the same name?


I like it, time to do some detective work!
 

Stoof

THERE IS A PIGEON IN MY BANK ACCOUNT
Staff
Jun 5, 2004
32,219
64,273
Tbf Im not convinced by this latest itk, but most clubs outsource legal stuff. I know for instance that olswang often act for spurs

They have an in-house legal department. Most football clubs have an in-house legal department, and don't outsource that much of it at all. Only when things get a bit specific.

Confidentiality point that someone made is right. That shit gets you fired.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top