- Oct 2, 2004
- 49,582
- 52,938
- Staff
- #201
BestI'm wondering if we approached it cautiously knowing what Menses is about.
Typo
Ever
BestI'm wondering if we approached it cautiously knowing what Menses is about.
I'm not changing it nowBest
Typo
Ever
Mendes has no affiliation to spurs we messed about with it took to long thought we had time and in the end Chelsea coughed up.
ohhh, ohhh, hang on - I got pelted when I said it was spurs who messed round when the news broke he was off to Chelsea- and people blamed mendes (we know what a monumental twta he is, and we still try dealing with him ) and messing around. And shock horror, we’re woefully short going into the season - YET AGAIN.
“Earlier” doing a lot of heavy lifting (this from April!)Where is the locatelli itk…must have missed that ?
the one we really like is locatelli not sure if hes gettable this window . onana is on the list too aswell as few others .
Oh I seeee, I saw something on Twitter and I assumed it was from here, anyways I can’t help but think he’s probs be an upgrade on Bissouma“Earlier” doing a lot of heavy lifting (this from April!)
Woefully is a bit harsh.ohhh, ohhh, hang on - I got pelted when I said it was spurs who messed round when the news broke he was off to Chelsea- and people blamed mendes (we know what a monumental twta he is, and we still try dealing with him ) and messing around. And shock horror, we’re woefully short going into the season - YET AGAIN.
But tbf Mendes loves to move his players around more often than 7 years. I mean a 4+1 year to us would potentially get another move way before he’s 30. So more dollar in his pocket. We were just dragging our heels as usual imo. Can’t see us getting anyone else in tbf. The other winger on stand by can’t of been close or we would have heard about it by now. Let’s hope the young guys can step upAgreed, and given that Chelsea offered Neto a 7-year contract despite his injury woes, I don’t think the end result would have been any different.
The real downside of dithering on Neto is that we’ve now left ourselves with relatively little time to sort an alternative, and even if we manage to get one, that player will have had no preseason.
If we’d pressed the issue, the path forward could have been made clearer a month ago.
Pretty sure Liverpool wanted Diaz all along. It was just our bid that made them move earlier. Could be wrong.Think Mendes would have hawked Neto around behind our back even if we had agreed a deal like he did with Diaz. It is his job and when Chelsea bit with their offer of a 7 year contract he was only ever going to go there.
Interesting info about the kids. Ange obviously likes Mikey Moore but I’m surprised there’s so little faith in Donley and Devine. Both seem to have the potential. It very much sounds like they will go out on loan then. Very important, therefore, that they get a good worthwhile loan. It’s got to be at top Championship level at least to help their development. Given how well they did both last year and in preseason I would think they should have some suitors.Not sure why we even bother dealing with Mendes, especially when we’re never going to match what he’s looking for. Our only chance to get one of his players is when no other club wants the player. We rely on that too many times unfortunately.
On the younger players, had a convo regarding our youth and how well the U18 and 23s done last season. I mentioned a few names and the reply was “there’s a huge transition to take the next step and make it into regular first team, Mikey Moore has the best chance”.
TBH I thought a few other names would cement themselves but he wasn’t convinced and simply stated “we’ll see”.
Yes, I've posted in the player thread.On the earlier itk on locatelli, isn't he a CM?
Which makes one wonder why the question wasn't asked in that thread.Yes, I've posted in the player thread.