- Feb 1, 2005
- 55,533
- 204,721
- Admin
- #1
Another new thread for today's ITK
Hope its a speed boat they're running cause there's only a few weeks leftJust as reassurance, Ali Z has said in response to it being "quiet":
Just because there is no noise does not mean we are not close to deals, Poch and Levy run a tight ship.
Hopefully it won’t get ignored like all the rest of the ITK that doesn’t fit certain agendas.Just as an addendum
In reply to:
The sell before we buy line just been thrown out by JJ. Absolute joke
HY
It's not a line, it's policy and was agreed before Poch new contract. Multiple players have to be moved off the wage bill.
Reads as ITK, and should hopefully reduce the "Brave" and "Poch will leave because of this" stuff
Some things being said is hilarious ?
Some things being said is hilarious ?
I'm glad you've said this. However, for the majority of us who are in the dark we are generally going to go on what has happened in previous windows where we have come up short. Of course that doesn't warrant some of the OTT reactions but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't concerned.Some things being said is hilarious ?
I can understand your concern, and it is justified.I'm glad you've said this. However, for the majority of us who are in the dark we are generally going to go on what has happened in previous windows where we have come up short. Of course that doesn't warrant some of the OTT reactions but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't concerned.
Anyway, I can see why we need to shift players on, just with it happening so late it does make for a nervy ending to the window. Fingers crossed.
Poch has been unequivocal about working with a small squad. Currently, there are, by my count, 28 players in the first team with 5 or more U23 players getting some time with the first team in training (Edwards, Georgiou, Oakley-Booth, Griffiths, Harrison, Sterling). That brings the total to 33 players.
I don't think its about money, I think its about not wanting 40 players out there in training.
Can't speak for him but I think he means my comment about 'what has happened in previous windows" not necessarily now.So no one is worried about Herc's comment about concern with "coming up short" being justified? Seems like his optimism has slowly faded over the past few months. I hope I am interpreting this incorrectly.