What's new

Match Threads Spurs vs Newcastle - Match Thread - Day 3

Match Prediction

  • Spurs to Win

    Votes: 131 85.1%
  • Spurs to Lose

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • Score Draw

    Votes: 22 14.3%
  • Goal-less Draw

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    154
  • Poll closed .

limmel

Member
Aug 7, 2008
70
71
I think that's the hardest I've seen Spurs fucked over. Lasagne gate, Mendes goal, the time a linesman disallowed a goal against us because the defender was playing the striker onside by such a margin the lino didn't even see him.
Nah, the worst was Vertonghen clearly receiving the ball in our half, going on to score and being given offside.
 

AllSeeingEye

YP Lee's Spiritual Guide
Apr 20, 2005
3,085
432
the one that's inline with the pitch markin
Christ that gets more embarrassing every time you look at it. It's more embarrassing than the penalty - which is a stupid rule not a stupid interpretation. Refs had a massive howler there.
I know right?
1601238262801.png
 

Attachments

  • 1601238161759.png
    1601238161759.png
    408.4 KB · Views: 75

RikkiRocket

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2015
1,605
3,277
You can like or dislike Steve Bruce, Roy Hodgson and/or even Jan Verthongen. But that trio knows probably more about professional football than all of us SCers combined. And to those of you defending the referee’s decision, VAR, etc.: you honestly believe this has anything to do with principal ideas of the game? Honestly? And you are right, but three professionals with a combined 100 years of experience as professionals in the game are wrong?
View attachment 74908

can we find out more about Charlotte?
 

BringBack_leGin

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2004
27,719
54,929
Match day morning, sunlight kissing the pitch a little more with every passing minute. Autumn mist slowly ascending, dew still glistening on each green needle, every one standing upright in anticipation of the impending battle. From the tenebrous hallway that leads to the barracks emerges a ashen haired figure, wafting towards the arena, indistinguishably murmuring in a Galician timbre. He stares at the magnificent galliform guarding the gantry and, puffing his chest out, roars ‘today, we are intelligent ****s’.
And so, it transpired that the ashen haired figure and his troops, without transgressing in any way, were ultimately outdone by most masterfully ****y **** of all, a smooth scalped enigma behind an Ozian curtain by name of Michael Percival Dean, and his puppet Peter Lucien Bankes.
 

taidgh

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2004
7,903
16,260
Carroll is offside, it's clear as day
Fucking hell, that's even more annoying looking at that graphic.

Carroll is clearly offside. Corrupt fucks.
How are you judging he's offside? And just to preempt you, Carroll's arm doesn't count for judging offside. It has to be a part of the body you can legally play the ball with (head, foot, shoulder, etc.)
 

Beni

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2004
5,432
6,131
How are you judging he's offside? And just to preempt you, Carroll's arm doesn't count for judging offside. It has to be a part of the body you can legally play the ball with (head, foot, shoulder, etc.)

The blue line is where our last mans position is. The blue line goes half way through Carroll’s Head. So he is half a head offside.
 

Waiwonder

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2012
387
887
I think its the lack of clarity regarding the rules at present.

People may say the refs are following the rules but to have ball to hand from less than a yard away, back turned as well is clearly in conflict with the rules where its deemed not a handball if a player has no time to react via a ricochet or deflection or whether the player can't see the ball.

Its this area that is frustrating everybody. Too much has gone into the 'Arms out of their natural body silhoutte position' and not enough through common sense and logic.
 

UbeAstard

Well-Known Member
May 31, 2005
3,374
2,443
This handball decision process will go away, it wont survive the game. Who are the people that agreed the process? Their names should forever be remembered for the damage they have done to the game whatever else they have done.
 

SheffieldAndy

Friends with the monster under my bed.
Jul 4, 2012
1,677
1,985
Blue line isn't what they're looking at, it's the yellow line.
The yellow line is matched on Dier’s forearm in the pic though (which he can’t play the ball with), and is in line with Carroll’s shirt sleeve (which he can play the ball with).
 

Mr Pink

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2010
55,024
100,048
How are you judging he's offside? And just to preempt you, Carroll's arm doesn't count for judging offside. It has to be a part of the body you can legally play the ball with (head, foot, shoulder, etc.)

Head
 

Beni

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2004
5,432
6,131
Blue line isn't what they're looking at, it's the yellow line.

The yellow line doesn’t match upto Davies or Dier, the blue line does. Only thing yellow line lines upto which is Carroll’s arm which would be incorrect
 

Beni

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2004
5,432
6,131
Looks like another flimsy last paragraph of the rule.

Leeway is given if there are ricochets and and if the player can’t see the ball? So is that a law or upto the referee if they’re feeling generous on the day, who it’s happened against and whether they want to be lenient or not . It’s just crazy

FBB37E69-951B-4454-ABE9-282FF8499B77.png
 

taidgh

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2004
7,903
16,260
Nope it's in front.
I've seen the pictures posted on here. Grainy, unfocused shots of screen grabs. If you have something better, please do share, but from what I see, there's no way you can definitively say Carroll's head is in front.
 
Top