- May 26, 2004
- 4,900
- 2,357
Real tough watch today. Fulham were the better team, and looked to have a much more effective plan than us.
I really get worried with how easily our full backs get dragged high and wide, leaving people to run into vacant space down the sides of our centre backs. As a centre back that would give me kittens
the amount of injuries and absences is undoubtedly playing a part, but I wonder at what point would an untested but square peg in square hole option be better than playing the likes of Sonny upfront, Werner against a deep back line, Sarr and Bissouma when we need more a bit more guile, thrust and creativity in midfield.
Maybe not from the start, but would someone like Lankshear have been a better option upfront than Son, with Deli going into midfield?
I really get worried with how easily our full backs get dragged high and wide, leaving people to run into vacant space down the sides of our centre backs. As a centre back that would give me kittens
the amount of injuries and absences is undoubtedly playing a part, but I wonder at what point would an untested but square peg in square hole option be better than playing the likes of Sonny upfront, Werner against a deep back line, Sarr and Bissouma when we need more a bit more guile, thrust and creativity in midfield.
Maybe not from the start, but would someone like Lankshear have been a better option upfront than Son, with Deli going into midfield?