Don't think Selby has a valid point that Ronnie smashing his way out of snookers is disrespectful: if anything, smashing the ball like that should on balance be worse for O'Sullivan than it is for Selby, and it's then up to Selby to capitalise on that. If Ronnie wants to trust to luck rather than planning/skill when smashing the balls, it's Selby's job to punish that and he can't complain if the balls break in his opponent's favour when Ronnie has actively given up trying to control the frame.
Haven’t seen Selby’s interview but I dislike the fella so if he’s pissed I doth my cap to O’Sullivan. Personally I don’t like how he often comes back to the table needing 3 or 4 snookers just to disrupt his opponent’s rhythm. Also - and of equal importance - he looks like a murderer and is from Leicester, a place I hate.
Well done Ronnie.
Have now read Selby’s interview - what a tit. Truth is he shies away from the sort of shots that won Ronnie that match and opts for safety. There were 2 or 3 shots in the final 2 frames where Selby declined a long pot - what always made Hendry great was the attitude that the only way to control the table was to pot the balls. That attitude turned the match for Ronnie tonight - fair play to him.