What's new

Simon Jordan: Levy is ‘as smart as paint’ for taking out £175m loan amid coronavirus pandemic

dagraham

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2005
19,128
46,117
Quite apt seeing as watching paint dry has been more fun that watching us play this season.
 

teok

Well-Known Member
Aug 11, 2011
10,864
33,700
I didn't actually know if this was going to be an insult or a compliment.
 

TwanYid

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2013
1,223
3,484
By borrowing this money, Levy is in a sense laying down a tarp to protect the club from the drips and spills of possible financial fallout.
 

Spriggan

7 inches from the midday sun!
Jun 15, 2012
939
1,895
Us and united apparently but that’s no surprise as we are the two clubs that paid the most Tax

Qualification for this loan is based on our corporate credit rating, and only THFC and Manure qualified. If I can find the original article I read I’ll post a link.
 

buckley

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2012
2,595
6,073
Arsenal and us paid the most tax a few years ago but Arsenal have changed their system so as to pay no tax as do other clubs tax avoidance if you will it has its obvious upside the downside is a non profitable company is unlikely to obtain a loan the size of this one .
Little as I know about this subject I believe it is something to do with paying tax on profit and most clubs spend any potential profits on transfers and investments so as to show the club making nil profit thus no tax under the current rules for football .
I believe going down this route results in clubs unable to loan vast amounts as their books portray the club as making nil profit therefore banks unwilling to loan as under these circumstances any club making nil profit is in no position to repay a loan .
Of course I am probably 100% wide of the mark but until its explained to me I will go on believing in this theory.
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,680
104,957
Arsenal and us paid the most tax a few years ago but Arsenal have changed their system so as to pay no tax as do other clubs tax avoidance if you will it has its obvious upside the downside is a non profitable company is unlikely to obtain a loan the size of this one .
Little as I know about this subject I believe it is something to do with paying tax on profit and most clubs spend any potential profits on transfers and investments so as to show the club making nil profit thus no tax under the current rules for football .
I believe going down this route results in clubs unable to loan vast amounts as their books portray the club as making nil profit therefore banks unwilling to loan as under these circumstances any club making nil profit is in no position to repay a loan .
Of course I am probably 100% wide of the mark but until its explained to me I will go on believing in this theory.

No, I think you’re right that’s pretty much it.
 

worcestersauce

"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
Jan 23, 2006
26,949
45,209
Good to hear from that well known financial guru Martin keown ??
We've obviously lost income but the stadium loan was never crippling and now the club has £175m worth of cheap money that will make more interest in the bank than the interest it has to pay for borrowing it.
 
Top