- Oct 5, 2004
- 564
- 111
everton may well have a bigger stadium but it is horrible compared to WHL.
These are fair points but remember that finances are only relevant based on their effect on the team's current and future success. Citeh's owners have thrown £300m at it and just about scraped into CL. They might spend another billion and not win the CL (Chelsea haven't). Clearly it's diminishing returns - 10x money <> 10x success
Ummmmm sorry to be a total dick but I would say it was mathmatics :wink:.
debatable at best
Try doing physics without maths and you'll see it's not really debatable.
debatable at best
As a soon to be master of mathematics, I say mathematics is a science.
As a soon to be master of everything, I say bow down biatch. :bow:
Not sure I agree on you're criteria.
Si = the most important
TL = Top flight longevity - league preformance would probably be better
St = Stadium/Facilities - Doesn't matter. means little.
LD = Last decade performance - means nothing in 20 years, otherwise known as meaning mothing
Fi = Current financial muscle - means nothing
Fa = Fan base -important
To = Total
Silverwhere is difficult because one would need to apply value to each compotition won, and its value at the time. For example when Villa won the League when it had only one division and some big clubs of the time regected joining it, its not like it matters that much, and the FA cup held more value at the time. Now the FA cup holds less value but still means quite a lot. UEFA cup is probably the won to have lost most value. But I think only liverpool have won it since its loss in value.
everton may well have a bigger stadium but it is horrible compared to WHL.