- Oct 17, 2006
- 10,779
- 25,498
For your post match ratings and assessments
English not being my native language I'm not 100% sure what this means, but I'm pretty sure I agreeWith regards to Davies' performance "The stone that the builder refused, turns out to be the head corner stone"
Not all green kits have painful memories, though.Green kit - 2
Lucky not to be added to the list of kits which bring back painful memories.
Ben was goodKulu & Spence 8
Johnson & Gray 7
Everyone else a bit meh.
It’s not stupidity or arrogance, it’s a recognition that you can’t play the same players all game every game. Don’t criticise him for that, criticise him for failing to get the 11 he did start to play better. They should be good enough, The fact they weren’t isn’t all on Ange. Werner was terrible, Forster was erratic, the team didn’t play well in front of the defence. Some of that is on the players, some is on Ange.Yeah Kulusevski. He has received loads of negative feedback in this forum over the summer but he seems to be our catalyst and is integral to the way we play. I would say he is one of the most important players in the side, even though many people would not have him in their first 11 or if they did he would be in a variety of positions.
I think Ange was either stupid or arrogant to make so many changes today and we were very lucky to get a result. Hopefully this result can galvanise us to go on a good run of performances and results now.