- Jun 29, 2007
- 4,154
- 27,145
May not be wise for the club to appeal, but if I were Bentancur I’d be there with full legal representation making clear that if they ban him while letting Fernandez off scott free, I’d be taking it all the way to CAS.Not sure the club would want to be seen appealing this, even though it’s a disgrace that Fernandez has got away with it due to reasons
I thought the ruling in his sanctions was late last week ? Strange we haven't heard anything yet ...
That was the rumour of the higher extent of the ban when it was announced.Stupid thing to say these days........but 10 - 12 games?????
Not having it and if they come out with that length of ban I hope the club appeal it purely on the Fernandez basis.Stupid thing to say these days........but 10 - 12 games?????
I see where you’re coming from, but really, why wouldn’t they if they felt it was unfair?Not sure the club would want to be seen appealing this, even though it’s a disgrace that Fernandez has got away with it due to reasons
Waiting for Bissouma to get injuredI think they're trying to find the most inconvenient time to confirm the outcome, just for added sh*ts & giggles.
His response was due last week.I thought the ruling in his sanctions was late last week ? Strange we haven't heard anything yet ...
Ah right. Thanks very much.His response was due last week.
I imagine, if he has good representation, his response showed contrition, an acknowledgement of the inappropriateness - and his efforts to make things right with Sonny, and Sonny's response.
None of that makes what he said right, or appropriate. But, it also gives the FA a way out - and determining that a lengthy ban would serve no purpose. And avoids what they now probably see as a discrepancy with the Enzo Fernandez situation - pursuing one but not the other.
So, hopefully, this is taking time to play-out behind the scenes.
Or, the alternative is, they issued their ruling to Bentantur and the club last week and one or the other (or both) have appealed the ruling, and thus it has not been publicly announced until the appeal process has played out.
If Enzo was on international duty, Lolo certainly wasn’t on club duty.Not having it and if they come out with that length of ban I hope the club appeal it purely on the Fernandez basis.
You can’t have Lolo banned for that length of time for comments made close season and Fernandez getting away with what he was chanting just because they don’t want to upset Chelsea and have said they won’t do anything because he was on international duty.
If the Argentinian FA don’t want to punish Fernandez then they have the ability to do so if they really wanted to