- Jul 29, 2004
- 22,713
- 373,775
He's, been both.He's been injured not over looked.
He's, been both.He's been injured not over looked.
I'm not sure u21 experience is relevant tbh.My frustration is that this kid is showing up our first team and he has hardly any U21 experience
It shows that having a player in the proper position is better than playing someone out of position who may be one of the best players in the league(son)
Frankly ange should have started Lankshear if Richy wasn't fit as he would have done better than Son as a no.9 against 2 of the biggest CB's in the league.
Lankshear got 23 goals in 24 goals in a level above Moore last year and got a goal in the most difficult atmosphere in Europe he deserved a better chance than he got
And he is just 17.
We need to think long-term here, and not simply about this season. That is a weight that no 17 yo should face.
He should start some, and come off the bench some.
This.Yep, I hate the thought of throwing a 17 year old in and having to rely on him but our other options are so bad, we don't really have a choice.
He's the only winger we've got who can keep and use the ball.
That's quite something.
The maths are strong with this one...1957 is a lot more than 17 years 245 days ago![]()