What's new

Harry Kane

coy-spurs1882

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
3,989
10,442
If that is really what the club said, there may be some truth in that Kane had expressed a desire to go. Otherwise, the club would have said he's not for sale to anybody.
the club would never say this. i am sure levy has his valuation on every player, however i can't see any club would be willing to meet the valuation of kane by levy, especially with the long term contract signed
 

noiseboy55

Well-Known Member
Mar 23, 2007
2,349
2,125
I see the media let's unsettle Tottenham's crown jewel by incessantly linking him to Man Utd because they're a far bigger club than Tottenham train is in full force again. Just like Poch last year. Utterly insulting how they continue to get away with this shit.
 

RichieS

Well-Known Member
Dec 23, 2004
11,916
16,436
I can't agree with this Pinky . They've just stapled his hammy back onto the bone...We've already been seeing for the last 18 months - 2 years a Kane playing a different style possibly to protect his often injured body .Owen was honest about his hammy recently..he said he never sprinted because he worried about the injury...Kane is certainly going to be aware of this danger when playing .

He can still shoot brilliantly, his passes are sublime and is a perfect pen taker....but the bustling beast-mode Kane has quietly left us imo .The man who would terrorise CB's, press like a mad thing and create his own goals out of nothing , is far less in evidence .

The 200mill Man U story looks like pure invention to me , but should we get a huge offer from a foreign team ,its gonna have to be thought about at least imo .
Him bulldozing one of the Dortmund defenders at Wembley a couple of years back is one of my favourite moments of his time at the top. I really hope he can get back to that.
 

hughy

I'm SUPER cereal.
Nov 18, 2007
31,840
56,924
A couple of weak media links and this thread is moved to the transfer forum?

Move it back FFS. Disrespectful to both us and Harry.
 

Timbo Tottenham

Well-Known Member
May 7, 2006
2,257
5,994
United are now trying to cover their backsides to make it look like they can’t afford a big signing. Rather than the reality of going to them being a step backwards and us being unwilling to sell to them anyway...
 

Frozen_Waffles

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2005
3,760
9,505
What's annoying me is how easily people are throwing United forward as the 'top candidates'. Why would he risk potentially playing Europa League football for the next 2 plus years? And I know that could very well end up being the case here but I mean if he is looking to secure a big money move it would be to a club who has more of a chance of playing at the highest level every season.

United fans back to their 'let's just click our fingers and get him' mentality just because Bruno Fernandes had them playing good football for a few games. All these pundits should be asking why he'd even want to move there not whether United should buy him or not.

This is it, I would be more worried about the other side in Manchester.

With Kane, there is not many clubs that can afford him. City and real are the only teams who are going to do it, I'd be surprised if he went.
 

Frozen_Waffles

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2005
3,760
9,505
Genuinely think he will leave. When Jose was appointed, I think Harry would have wanted to see where the club was heading but it's pretty clear Jose won't be backed as he has been previously so Kane rightfully wants out. The guy deserves trophies and he won't get them with us. I will be gutted when he leaves but Levy and ENIC have put us in this fucked up situation and we are going to pay for it for a very long time. It is going to be a very tough watch for the next 3/4 years at least. A lot keep saying it but until they sell up, this club will win nothing.

Firstly it is pretty clear he won't be backed because....?

3/4 years with Lo celso, ndombele, dele, Winks, sanchez, sess, Fernandes, foyth, Bergwijn etc. (some of the best young talent around).

3/4 years with the best manager of this century.

3/4 years with son, Toby, lloris (some of the best players in the world)

Yes we changed manager mid season after reaching the cl final and achieving cl football.

Why are you linking the Kane situation to how enic and levy? Or is it any old reason you decided to stick the knife in?
 

Doctor Dinkey

Legacy Fan
Jul 6, 2013
3,591
8,687
Firstly it is pretty clear he won't be backed because....?

3/4 years with Lo celso, ndombele, dele, Winks, sanchez, sess, Fernandes, foyth, Bergwijn etc. (some of the best young talent around).

3/4 years with the best manager of this century.

3/4 years with son, Toby, lloris (some of the best players in the world)

Yes we changed manager mid season after reaching the cl final and achieving cl football.

Why are you linking the Kane situation to how enic and levy? Or is it any old reason you decided to stick the knife in?
Wowza those are some massively powerful Spurs tinted spectacles you're wearing there pal
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,680
104,956
This is it, I would be more worried about the other side in Manchester.

With Kane, there is not many clubs that can afford him. City and real are the only teams who are going to do it, I'd be surprised if he went.

Plus Aguero is probably going to leave in a year’s time. It’s all aligning for him to go there were he to leave.
 

Hotspur88

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2008
3,146
75,106
Firstly it is pretty clear he won't be backed because....?

3/4 years with Lo celso, ndombele, dele, Winks, sanchez, sess, Fernandes, foyth, Bergwijn etc. (some of the best young talent around).

3/4 years with the best manager of this century.

3/4 years with son, Toby, lloris (some of the best players in the world)

Yes we changed manager mid season after reaching the cl final and achieving cl football.

Why are you linking the Kane situation to how enic and levy? Or is it any old reason you decided to stick the knife in?
Firstly I have never been one to jump on Levy and ENIC. I have always been very patient. However, my point is they missed a huge opportunity to sign players when we had a genuine chance at winning the title. We stood still for too long and we have paid for that. We had a great team but were a couple of players short of being a title winning team. Kane is apparently ready for a new challenge as he feels he has a better chance of winning trophies elsewhere. It is also clear that if we don't get CL next season, then the money won't be the same, hence why I said Jose would not be backed as he/we may like!
 

thekneaf

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2011
1,933
3,878
Firstly I have never been one to jump on Levy and ENIC. I have always been very patient. However, my point is they missed a huge opportunity to sign players when we had a genuine chance at winning the title. We stood still for too long and we have paid for that. We had a great team but were a couple of players short of being a title winning team. Kane is apparently ready for a new challenge as he feels he has a better chance of winning trophies elsewhere. It is also clear that if we don't get CL next season, then the money won't be the same, hence why I said Jose would not be backed as he/we may like!
What's a shame, and entirely predictable, is when there is a global pretty flat transfer market in the next 12 months and a focus on deals for top players at financially struggling teams, there will be an element that will blame Levy for being tight.

We spent loads this summer. And yes the timing was poor as we needed it 18 months previous but we had a stadium to build and for better or worse we prioritised that.

Now, having an incredibly expensive stadium the model is (well was pre Covid) plainly to spend to get us to the next level.

We may have hated the sacking of Poch but in no way can it be categorised as cheap.

Likewise the contracts we dished out for key players. The very contract for Kane that makes it unlikely he'll leave this summer. Not due to loyalty necessarily, but because the market isn't there for elite players. A report today has Mbappe valued at €35m.
 

Cochise

Well-Known Member
Aug 8, 2019
4,762
12,519
I'd have had him as nailed on to go this summer tbh. Now however, I'm not so sure.

As I posted a while back, Sancho going to UTD ruins any chance they have of signing Kane. I don't think anyone could afford the pair of them and that's even without going into the FFP regulations.
 

YiddoTom90

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2015
1,456
2,051
I'd have had him as nailed on to go this summer tbh. Now however, I'm not so sure.

As I posted a while back, Sancho going to UTD ruins any chance they have of signing Kane. I don't think anyone could afford the pair of them and that's even without going into the FFP regulations.
I would ask for greenwood and Rashford in exchange if he goes there
 

Yid-ol

Just-outside Edinburgh
Jan 16, 2006
31,097
19,275
But will those two want to come this way having already had a taste of Maureen.
How-did-They-Do-that--meme-46753.jpg
 

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,143
15,550
I see the media let's unsettle Tottenham's crown jewel by incessantly linking him to Man Utd because they're a far bigger club than Tottenham train is in full force again. Just like Poch last year. Utterly insulting how they continue to get away with this shit.
We can't just blame the media. We're not uniquely persecuted - United get linked with players from smaller teams all the time. If in the last 20 years we'd won eight Premier Leagues, two FA Cups, four League Cups and the Champions League, I'm sure it'd be the other way round.
 

double0

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2006
14,423
12,258
At the end of the day Kane left he door open...The media hasn't got much else to write about nowadays.
 
Top