Wasn’t sure where to put this, but just got a little inside scoop on an issue that is slowly beginning to boil over at spurs:
just been told that there are serious issues between our Argie boys over their inconsistent caring of Lo Celso. Apparently Gazzaniga has been allowing our Gio to have turkey dinosaurs for his tea despite Poch giving them a strict diet for Gio whilst he is staying with them. This is causing huge issues for the others because when he stays over with Erik or Juan he is demanding the dinosaurs and won’t eat the healthy meals they are preparing for him. Not only this, they are struggling to get him to sleep at bed time and, whilst nobody can confirm, they both believe Paulo is letting him stay up beyond his bed time to watch Eastenders because he is demanding to know the latest on Phil Mitchell’s condition and has frequent tantrums on a Wednesday night. This culminating in Gio threatening to “do Juan’s windows in” and “slash that mug Erik’s tyres”. The club have now stepped in.
obviously worrying if true.
Wasn’t sure where to put this, but just got a little inside scoop on an issue that is slowly beginning to boil over at spurs:
just been told that there are serious issues between our Argie boys over their inconsistent caring of Lo Celso. Apparently Gazzaniga has been allowing our Gio to have turkey dinosaurs for his tea despite Poch giving them a strict diet for Gio whilst he is staying with them. This is causing huge issues for the others because when he stays over with Erik or Juan he is demanding the dinosaurs and won’t eat the healthy meals they are preparing for him. Not only this, they are struggling to get him to sleep at bed time and, whilst nobody can confirm, they both believe Paulo is letting him stay up beyond his bed time to watch Eastenders because he is demanding to know the latest on Phil Mitchell’s condition and has frequent tantrums on a Wednesday night. This culminating in Gio threatening to “do Juan’s windows in” and “slash that mug Erik’s tyres”. The club have now stepped in.
obviously worrying if true.
Makes sense. However one niggle is the permanent element of the deal falls within next summer’s spend, even if cash instalments are over a period of time. Therefore, is GLC really a summer 2020 spend, when we could very well be losing 3 of our best players in CE, Verts and Toby on frees. We haven’t got too much value to realise on sales next year.Loan helps us meet our revolving credit facility terms early, which does saves us cash, and makes us look better to potential investors.
True. I get the impression (but this is in no way definite) that the Lo Celso loan structure might have had as much to do with having funds to buy Dybala as it was to save Betis a couple of million quid.Makes sense. However one niggle is the permanent element of the deal falls within next summer’s spend, even if cash instalments are over a period of time. Therefore, is GLC really a summer 2020 spend, when we could very well be losing 3 of our best players in CE, Verts and Toby on frees. We haven’t got too much value to realise on sales next year.
Maybe I’m missing the point through lack of knowledge, but if the above is broadly the case, our next spend in this transfer window, whilst cleverly structured, actually wasn’t that dramatic.
Makes sense. However one niggle is the permanent element of the deal falls within next summer’s spend, even if cash instalments are over a period of time. Therefore, is GLC really a summer 2020 spend, when we could very well be losing 3 of our best players in CE, Verts and Toby on frees. We haven’t got too much value to realise on sales next year.
Maybe I’m missing the point through lack of knowledge, but if the above is broadly the case, our next spend in this transfer window, whilst cleverly structured, actually wasn’t that dramatic.
You're getting cashflow mixed up with accounting profit and loss. A loan payment would be accounted over the duration of the loan - as they are normally 1 year then it'd all be accounted within that year (assuming it didn't span accounting years).We pay our fees across 4 year installments though so even if the deal was outright permanent our accounts would show 1/4th of the overall fee, c£15m if the rumoured total fee is to be believed.
The only thing the loan does is saves Real Betis £3m in the permanent % that they need to pay PSG. In theory this has reduced the fee we needed to pay and what was being demanded from Betis for the player.
It doesn't effect our net spend values as we do our payment structures over 4 year periods as stated so even if it was a permanent deal straight off the bat for £60m, the accounts would still show £15m spent like it will on the loan agreed
You joke but it happened at Arsenal with their French players.
One of those tactics videos that nerds make has been created following Lo Celso's move to Tottenham:
I believe in the ability of the video's creator not to make stupid and obvious transposition errors when presenting statistics, so I'm going to base my expectations on 3:13 and expect a not-unreasonable 4 assists per game from Lo Celso this season.
I’m pretty sure that @freeeki will help your “friend” find outIf you're a male who has heretofore been heterosexual his entire life- but who now finds himself having constant, hardcore sexual fantasies involving Giovani Lo Celso- does that mean you're gay?
Asking for a friend.
Excellent article on GLC and Poch from GiveMeSport...
My understanding was this was primarily an agreement between Levy and Betis to increase Betis' share of the sale and reduce the sell on clause payment to PSG who do not get a proportion of the loan fee (i.e. 20% of €40 rather than €55m).Loan helps us meet our revolving credit facility terms early, which does saves us cash, and makes us look better to potential investors.