- Mar 18, 2005
- 32,767
- 76,826
Would love to read his future autobiography to find out what on earth happened during his time here.
I don’t think it’s any particular big mystery, he was bought for an attacking system then we brought in 3 consecutive managers who play a defensive system that he doesn’t particularly suit. That plus numerous small injuries. Even under Ange if he didn’t get injured at Fulham he probably would have featured more by this point.Would love to read his future autobiography to find out what on earth happened during his time here.
This is so simple yet astute yet mentioned so littleYep with so many changes splitting the Bissouma/Sarr midfield was a mistake, should have retained that axis and simply slotted GLC in for Maddison.
I don’t think it’s any particular big mystery, he was bought for an attacking system then we brought in 3 consecutive managers who play a defensive system that he doesn’t particularly suit. That plus numerous small injuries. Even under Ange if he didn’t get injured at Fulham he probably would have featured more by this point.
I have seen enough of him throughout his career to know he’s a talented footballer. Not only that you can see how highly those in the Argentinian squad rate him, including Messi. It’s a shame that he will probably not get a proper run of games under Ange with good players around him but such is football. Realistically, regardless if I rate him or not, he has to leave in Jan as if he can’t get starts with Maddison out there is absolutely no point keeping him.
He’s a dam sight better than hojberg defensively, made some great tackles yesterdayNo reason that can't happen once the back 4 is sorted out a bit. People seem to think he's weak defensively but he's not. He did really well when he got a run of games under Mourinho.
Yeah this idea that Hojbjerg is more physical and makes us stronger defensively is not what I see. People run off the back of him all the time and he pulls out of a lot of 50/50s. He doesn’t get around the pitch quickly either. Maybe image/histrionics counts for a lotHe’s a dam sight better than hojberg defensively, made some great tackles yesterday
Same understanding with udogieThis is so simple yet astute yet mentioned so little
Biss - Sarr built a very good understanding and almost instinctively know what to do with and without the ball
You can tell that Biss is a little half arsed when he gives the ball to PEH or when PEH is in the middle and receives the ball (where Biss prefers to receive)
I don’t disagree at all and he is very good defensively, it’s why he sometimes played DM for PSG. But if PEH, who we were and probably are still looking to sell, is getting starts ahead of Gio when Maddison is injured there’s not much point in keeping him around even tho I think he’d actually be good for us in this system. I’m hoping that after the break he starts against Villa but I just don’t see it.No reason that can't happen once the back 4 is sorted out a bit. People seem to think he's weak defensively but he's not. He did really well when he got a run of games under Mourinho.
Apparently his missus has had / is having a baby, they want to stay in London for the pregnancy rather than move clubs, and Gio has signalled he is willing to knuckle down as a happy squad player to allow this to happen...?He actively wants to leave anyway doesn't he?
People run off the back of him all the time and he pulls out of a lot of 50/50s. He doesn’t get around the pitch quickly either.
is this a question or a statement?Apparently his missus has had / is having a baby, they want to stay in London for the pregnancy rather than move clubs, and Gio has signalled he is willing to knuckle down as a happy squad player to allow this to happen...?
It's a statement with that annoying rising intonation at the end of it that people do - uptalk - to turn it into also a question?is this a question or a statement?
Erm. I don't know how to respond in that caseIt's a statement with that annoying rising intonation at the end of it that people do - uptalk - to turn it into also a question?
Sorry, I find this mad; he simply isn’t. I know absence makes a footballer better but Lo Celso has had four years to make an impression and he’s offered far less to us than Hojbjerg has.He’s a dam sight better than hojberg defensively, made some great tackles yesterday