Nathan Ake

JamieSpursCommunityUser

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
599
Hmmm ...

Thought he had some kind of first refusal or buy back clause in his contract for Chelsea anyway, if that were the case I doubt we'd get a sniff as they wouldn't let us.

Also hmmm ...
Even if Chelsea did or could exercise a buy back clause during their appeal or ban, surely the player would still need to to agree a contract with Chelsea?
 

Yiddo100

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2019
Messages
1,538
Don’t know if it’s been said but apparently he qualifies as homegrown
 

oskathegobshite

#Spursy
Joined
Jan 20, 2004
Messages
1,610
Good player but personally I don't think it looks like any of the centre backs will leave now and we have four good ones plus Dier so no
 

MatJspur

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
113
I wouldn't have thought so actually because they would be offered the option but wouldn't take it up, the fact that they can't take it up is irrelevant I reckon as Bournemouth can't be prevented from doing business because Chelsea have been sanctioned. As far as the player goes I'd be ok with him at Spurs.
Would also affect his freedom of movement
 

JamieSpursCommunityUser

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
599
I think he would be a good Jan backup, allowing us to keep players in their best position, and all while he learns under Jan in his last year with us. He does the LCB role, and can play in a three at the back, plus an emergency LB if needed. I can see the up side in Toby going and bringing in Ake, not a direct replacement for the outgoing player, but gives us the left option we need. Especially with Sanchez and Foyth both preferring to play on the right.

Makes me wonder if Dier has had ‘the talk’ and has declined one of the CB roles, hence the talk again of Man Utd saying he is underrated or whatever it was Ole said.
Maybe. Or perhaps Dier has had the CB talk, and the club now requires a 2nd LCB more than it does a 4th RCB behind Dier, Sanchez, Foyth?
 

TEESSIDE1

Wedding booked :D
Joined
Jul 3, 2006
Messages
10,720
Could this be viewed as an upgrade on Davies?
He can play left back as well and as a DM. Basically a taller, quicker and stronger version of Davies. I like Davies but he’s sadly one of those players that doesn’t suit our game and/or what we need to evolve eg quick attack minded full backs
 

JamieSpursCommunityUser

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
599
He can play left back as well and as a DM. Basically a taller, quicker and stronger version of Davies. I like Davies but he’s sadly one of those players that doesn’t suit our game and/or what we need to evolve eg quick attack minded full backs
Davies is actually 1cm taller.

Ake is 180cm (5'11), but I get your point.

It would be especially smart planning if we got Sessegnon to eventually be a Left Back, and rotated both behind Rose (and Jan).

Though also a shame to loose Davies, as he seems a good character for squad unity.
 

Jospur

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2011
Messages
1,135
Plays for himself. Not a team player.

Replacement for Vertonghen not a priority at the moment - far greater needs elsewhere in the team.

Suspect that this supposed interest in Ake is agent-driven...
 

scottlag10

Active Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2012
Messages
657
Never seen Ake stand out defensively in a side that regularly gets 'dicked' away from home by good teams
If Toby goes we still have 5 cb options in the squad. Replacing Toby at same level would cost VVD level money, imo midfield is priority area for strengthening
 

nailsy

SC Supporter
Joined
Jul 24, 2005
Messages
22,154
Like that's ever been a problem for them, lol.
But in this case it would mean the player agreeing to wait a year for a move and not knowing who the manager will be when he does join. Considering he's already been burned at Chelsea once he might not be willing to take that risk.
 

Vinny_Sammways_left_peg

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
5,365
But in this case it would mean the player agreeing to wait a year for a move and not knowing who the manager will be when he does join. Considering he's already been burned at Chelsea once he might not be willing to take that risk.
That is a fair point and he may well feel burnt, but this is Chelsea and in a footballing world where money talks they very rarely have a problem getting what they want.
 

Ben1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
1,229
Never seen Ake stand out defensively in a side that regularly gets 'dicked' away from home by good teams
If Toby goes we still have 5 cb options in the squad. Replacing Toby at same level would cost VVD level money, imo midfield is priority area for strengthening
No way we replace toby directly, it'll be with a younger player. Also think you're being incredibly optimistic in saying we have 5 options at cb. Dier hasn't played there in 2-3 years and Dvies has never really played CB in a back 4. That really just leaves the three, of which only one (a 32 year old) is left footed.
 

TEESSIDE1

Wedding booked :D
Joined
Jul 3, 2006
Messages
10,720
Davies is actually 1cm taller.

Ake is 180cm (5'11), but I get your point.

It would be especially smart planning if we got Sessegnon to eventually be a Left Back, and rotated both behind Rose (and Jan).

Though also a shame to loose Davies, as he seems a good character for squad unity.
Must be the hedge of top of his head that makes him look taller lol
 
Top